Activity and symptom diary: what to log when you are pacing, and what to do with it
With post-exertional malaise the cost of a day arrives 12 to 48 hours later, so memory blames the wrong day. A diary is the instrument that closes that gap. Here is the smallest version that still works, how to read it back, and how to fit months of it onto one page for a ten-minute appointment.

Short answer
An activity and symptom diary is a short daily record of what you did, how you felt, and — the part that does the real work — how you felt one, two and three days later. It exists because with post-exertional malaise the cost of an activity typically arrives 12 to 48 hours after the effort (1), long enough for memory to pin the crash on the wrong day. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention puts it plainly: keeping individual activity and symptom diaries may help people identify their personal limitations (2).
If you have tried to keep a diary before and abandoned it, that is a design problem, not a discipline problem, and it is not laziness or weakness. An elaborate diary costs energy you do not have, and the fuller it is, the faster it stops. The version below starts with four fields and grows only if you want it to.
Note: this article explains a self-management approach and is not medical advice. A diary is not a diagnostic test, and nothing in it can confirm or rule out a condition. New, changing or worsening symptoms need a clinician, because several treatable conditions can look like an energy-limiting illness.
Why keep an activity and symptom diary when you are pacing?
Because the usual way humans work out cause and effect does not function here.
In ordinary tiredness, the bill and the purchase sit in one transaction: you walk too far, your legs ache that evening, you recover overnight. Post-exertional malaise breaks that. NICE's ME/CFS guideline (NG206, 2021) describes a worsening of symptoms that is "often delayed in onset by hours or days", "disproportionate to the activity" and has "a prolonged recovery time", and gives the typical window as 12 to 48 hours (1).
Patient data fills in that delay. In a survey of 150 people with ME/CFS, 129 — 90% — had post-exertional malaise after physical exertion, cognitive exertion and emotional distress alike; 11% described a consistent delay of at least 24 hours before onset, and 84% said an episode lasted 24 hours or more (3). In NIH focus groups, 18 participants were asked about their symptoms after a cardiopulmonary exercise test; 17 said symptoms started within 24 hours and peaked within 72 (4).
Two days is enough for three or four other candidate causes to appear — a short night, a conversation, the weather, a missed meal. Reconstructing the week afterwards, you reach for the most recent or most vivid event rather than the expensive one: people blame the Thursday they crashed instead of the Tuesday that caused it. A diary is the only instrument that holds Tuesday still.
The second reason is that spending does not all look like effort. NICE counts cognitive, physical, emotional and social activity, and lists sensory stimulation among what an energy management plan should cover (1). A step count sees none of that; crashing with a step count of zero goes through those hidden costs. A diary is also what pacing runs on: our guide to pacing for chronic illness compares the approaches, and almost all need a record underneath.
What is the minimum viable symptom diary?
The smallest diary that still works has four fields. Everything else is an upgrade.
Starting this small is not modesty. A diary is itself an activity: attention, screen time and decisions come out of the same budget. NICE puts it in one recommendation — make self-monitoring of activity as easy as possible, taking advantage of any tools the person already uses, such as an activity tracker, phone heart-rate monitor or diary (1). The tool you already have beats the better tool you will stop opening.
The four-field diary
| Field | When | What it looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Morning rating | Before getting up | A number out of 10 for how much you have today |
| What I did | End of the day | Three to six short items, each with a rough duration |
| How I felt | End of the day | One line, plus your worst symptom scored out of 10 |
| Day +2 check | Two days later, on the same line | Better / same / worse |
Roughly two minutes, and enough to find clean days. The day +2 check is the field people drop first and the one that carries the method: without it you have a mood log, not a pacing instrument.
The fuller diary adds position, type of activity and a longer look-back. The section below explains why each field earns its place.
| Field | When | What it looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Morning energy | Before getting up, before coffee | 0–10 or 0–100, same scale daily |
| Activity blocks | Through the day | "25 min email, sitting, cognitive"; "shower, standing, physical" |
| Upright time | Rough daily total | "About 3 h upright" |
| Symptoms | End of day | Your usual two or three, each 0–10 |
| Context | End of day | Short night, infection, heat, hard conversation, period day 1 |
| Delayed check | +24 h, +48 h, +72 h | Better / same / worse, and which symptoms |
If you already take a morning resting heart rate or HRV reading, add it as one more column, always under the same conditions.
Two rules make either version survivable. Write on the day, not on Sunday — reconstructing a week in one sitting produces a tidier record that is also less true. And use the same scale every time: a 4 means something only against your own previous 4s. A notes app, an envelope and a printed grid on the fridge all work; nothing here requires software.
What should you log each day, and why does each field earn its place?
NICE's list of what an energy management plan should record is the closest thing to an official field list: cognitive activity; mobility and other physical activity; activities of daily living; psychological, emotional and social demands; rest, sleep quality and duration; and environmental factors including sensory stimulation (1).
Morning rating. One number, before you get up and before anything has happened to it. It separates a bad day caused by yesterday from a bad day you started with. Leonard Jason's group at DePaul University built their energy-envelope work on this comparison — energy expended divided by energy perceived as available — and found that people who kept the two close had significant improvements in physical functioning and fatigue severity (5). Our guide to finding your energy envelope covers how the two ratings work together.
Activity in blocks, with three labels. Not "did some housework" but "15 min kitchen, standing, physical".
Duration. Forty minutes of something easy and ten of something hard are different purchases, and only the clock separates them.
Body position. Lying, sitting, upright. Upright time is its own cost, it matters a great deal if you have orthostatic symptoms, and it is invisible to a step counter.
Type. Physical, cognitive, emotional, sensory, social. With 90% of people in that survey of 150 reporting post-exertional malaise after emotional distress as well as physical and cognitive exertion (3), a day with no steps and three difficult phone calls is not a rest day.
Published activity-log methods work this way. Using two-day activity logs recording the pattern, intensity and qualitative nature of activity in people with diagnosed chronic fatigue syndrome, Jason and colleagues found that time spent feeling fatigued went with more time in pain and more time doing activities the person found fatiguing — while time in activities people called meaningful went with less fatigue (6). The diary is not a list of everything you must cut.
Symptoms, with a severity number, plus five words of context. Track the two or three symptoms you actually have — often fatigue, cognitive difficulty and pain, the core symptoms described in the NIH focus groups (4) — because numbers can be compared across weeks and "rough" cannot. Then note anything else that moved the floor: a short night, a heatwave, an infection, an appointment, a cycle day. Without that line you will conclude a quiet week was expensive, when what happened was a virus.
The delayed check, at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Almost every template leaves this out, and it is the field that makes the rest mean anything. In practice it is three boxes per day, filled in on the three days that follow, marking better, same or worse against your usual. Seventy-two hours is where the NIH focus-group participants described symptoms peaking (4), just past NICE's 12-to-48-hour window (1). If you add one thing to a diary you already keep, add this.
How do you read a symptom diary back without blaming the wrong day?
Writing it down is the easy half.
Find clean days first. Mark every day whose following 72 hours showed no worsening, then look at what those days have in common: total upright time, the length of the longest block, how many cognitive blocks, whether anything was emotionally loaded. Those shared features are the closest thing you have to a current baseline, and NICE's advice is to build the plan around a sustainable level of activity as the first step, which may mean reducing activity (1).
Then read a window, not a day. The commonest error is to take the day before a crash and blame it. Because the delay is 12 to 48 hours (1) and symptoms can peak at 72 (4), the useful unit is a rolling stretch of three to seven days. A moderate Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday can add up to a cost no single day would have produced. In practice: total your upright hours and activity blocks across each rolling three days, and set that total beside the delayed-check column.
Know what a pattern is, and what it is not. A pattern has happened several times, in the same direction, with a roughly consistent delay, and survives an obvious alternative explanation: three showers followed by a worse afternoon is worth testing, one bad Tuesday is a Tuesday. It is still not proof of cause — your diary cannot separate the shower from the heat, the standing, the arm work and the fact that you usually shower on days you had already planned to do more. Nor can it promise the pattern will hold: NICE describes the energy limit as different for every person and fluctuating over time (1), so a baseline found in March may not fit in September.
Expect your pattern to be yours alone. When Jason and Brown asked 90 people with chronic fatigue syndrome to rate fatigue intensity every 30 minutes across a single day and clustered the results, three trajectories emerged: high fatigue that stayed flat; moderate fatigue with high variability that fell over the day; and moderate fatigue with high variability that rose. The groups also differed on actigraphy, pain and immune measures (7). There is no single shape of a day in this illness.
Review weekly, briefly. Ten minutes, two questions: which days were clean, and what the costly ones had in common. Monthly, one more: has the floor moved.
Can a symptom tracker app predict a crash?
No. As of 2026 we are not aware of any validated algorithm — in any app, on any wearable — that can tell an individual a post-exertional crash is coming. Treat any product implying otherwise with suspicion.
The best test so far is the Pace Me randomised controlled trial, published in Nature Communications in 2026. It randomised 250 adults with Long COVID either to an app plus a wearable activity tracker that sent just-in-time energy-management messages at 50%, 75% and 100% of their daily activity allowance, or to the app alone with data-entry screens. The primary outcome was post-exertional malaise on the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire PEM subscale. After six months there was no time-by-group interaction (p = 0.614), and no individual question showed one either. The authors note that high recovery rates in Long COVID and broad inclusion criteria may have masked an effect, and suggest testing the framework in conditions without those recovery rates, such as chronic fatigue syndrome (8).
That is not a finding that tracking is useless: it says that adding a device and real-time nudges did not outperform the app alone, and looking backwards through a record — the use this article is about — was not what was tested. So, plainly: forwards, a number is context. A morning reading below your own usual is one more thing to weigh when you decide what today contains; it is not a verdict, and it does not know what you did on Tuesday. Backwards, it is a record of what the days before looked like, which is what memory cannot supply. When a number and your body disagree, go with your body.
Which symptom and fatigue questionnaires will a clinician recognise?
A diary and a validated questionnaire do different jobs. The diary compares your days with your own other days; a questionnaire is a standardised instrument with published psychometric properties, built so answers can be compared across people. None of these is a self-diagnosis tool, and nothing in this table replaces a clinical assessment.
| Instrument | What it measures | What the evidence says | Keep in mind |
|---|---|---|---|
| DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) | Symptoms of the main ME and CFS case definitions, rated for frequency and severity, usually over the past six months | Developed at DePaul University in original, expanded, brief and paediatric versions, with good test–retest reliability and construct, predictive and discriminant validity (9) | A research instrument, not a diagnosis; long in full |
| DSQ-PEM (the PEM items) | Post-exertional malaise specifically — five core items plus five on duration | The core items were recommended by the NIH/CDC Common Data Elements working group as a first step in measuring PEM; the duration items categorised people with ME or CFS correctly 81.7% of the time, and categorised multiple sclerosis and post-polio syndrome as ME or CFS 16.6% of the time (10) | That 16.6% is a real false-positive rate |
| FUNCAP | Functional capacity across eight domains, including being upright, activities in the home, communication, reactions to light and sound, and concentration | Built on repeated patient feedback; a 55-item version for diagnostic and disability assessment and a 27-item version for follow-up, validated in a Norwegian sample of 1,263 and an English-language international sample of 1,387, with negligible floor and ceiling effects (11) | Newer, so fewer clinicians know it by name; its domains map onto diary fields |
| Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) | How much fatigue interferes with specific activities | Developed in multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus; internally consistent, distinguished patients from controls, detected change over time, largely independent of self-reported depressive symptoms (12) | Measures fatigue severity, not post-exertional malaise |
| Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | The impact of fatigue on cognitive, physical and psychosocial function | A shortened form of the Fatigue Impact Scale, widely used in multiple sclerosis and reviewed for reliability and validity there (13) | Validated in MS, so scores elsewhere are harder to interpret |
A reasonable use: take one at the start of your record and again after a few months, and bring both alongside the diary. Repeated weekly they add burden without adding much. Ask which your clinician uses.
Paper, spreadsheet or symptom tracker app: which actually works?
The best answer is the one you will still be using in six weeks, and that depends more on how ill you are than on the software.
Paper notebook or printed grid — What it needs: A pen; Good at: No screen, battery or login; works at any severity; one glance shows a week; Keep in mind: Hard to total or search, easy to lose; one copy only
Notes app or voice memo — What it needs: A phone you already use; Good at: Voice entry means no typing; timestamps come free; backs up; Keep in mind: Entries scatter; no structure unless you impose one
Spreadsheet — What it needs: A laptop and tolerance for setup; Good at: Totals, rolling windows, sorting by clean days; exports for a clinician; Keep in mind: The setup day is itself a cost; fiddly on a phone
Dedicated symptom tracker app — What it needs: A phone, an account, sometimes a subscription; Good at: Structure out of the box, charts, export; Keep in mind: Taps add up; many were built for conditions without delayed payback, so the 24/48/72-hour check is often missing
Wearable plus a written log — What it needs: A compatible device, plus somewhere for the subjective part; Good at: Continuous heart rate or a morning reading next to your own ratings; Keep in mind: The device records exertion, not cost; adding a tracker to an app did not beat the app alone in the Pace Me trial (8)
Paper diaries have a documented compliance problem in research settings. In a study of people with chronic pain asked to make three pain entries a day at set times for 21 days, participants submitted paper cards corresponding to 90% of the assigned times. Photosensors in the binders told a different story: actual compliance was 11%, and on 32% of study days the binder was never opened, yet reported compliance for those days exceeded 90%. An electronic diary with compliance features reached 94% (1400320-3)). The fair caveat is that this was a research protocol with fixed entry times, which your own diary does not have — but it is why writing on the day matters.
Paper still wins outright in some situations. NICE describes people with severe ME/CFS as often unable to leave the house, frequently in bed and extremely sensitive to light and sound, and people with very severe ME/CFS as in bed all day and dependent on care (1). For someone in that position a bright screen is a sensory cost, and waking a phone to find an app is an activity block. A single number spoken aloud and written on a card by the bed beats an app that never gets opened.
This is the accessibility problem most app comparisons skip. Three things matter when you are mostly in bed:
Voice. Speaking one sentence costs far less than typing it; a voice memo, or a carer writing down what you say, is a legitimate log.
Large print and low light. Being able to read your own record without a backlit screen at full brightness.
Minimum taps. Count the taps between picking up the phone and the entry being saved. Four is a lot, and an app that needs more will lose to paper — correctly.
Our comparison of pacing apps sets out what each needs and where your data lives. Check first whether it has anywhere to record how you felt two days later. Many do not.
How do you turn months of logging into one page for a ten-minute appointment?
This step decides whether the diary was worth keeping, and most articles stop before it.
Appointments are short and front-loaded. In a secondary analysis of 112 recorded clinical encounters, clinicians elicited the patient's agenda in 36% of them, and where they did, they interrupted after a median of 11 seconds (15). Whatever is not on your page in the first minute may not be heard. Build it for someone reading in thirty seconds.
One page. Six blocks.
1. One sentence at the top, in bold. "When I do more than a certain amount, I get worse one to two days later, and it lasts several days." That describes post-exertional malaise without requiring the term.
2. The period and the method. "Daily log, 12 August to 21 October. Morning rating 0–10, activity blocks, symptoms 0–10, and a check at 24, 48 and 72 hours." That tells a clinician the data was collected prospectively.
3. A typical sustainable day, as blocks: "2 × 20 min desk work, sitting; shower, seated; 10 min walk; about 3 h upright in total."
4. Three or four documented episodes, in a small table. Date, what the preceding two days contained, when the worsening started, which symptoms, how long it lasted. Three well-recorded examples carry more weight than thirty rows.
5. What has changed, with numbers: episodes per month at the start and at the end, clean days per week, whether the sustainable day has grown or shrunk.
6. Your two questions, at the bottom so they do not get lost.
What to leave out. The whole diary — bring it, but do not hand it over. Raw wearable charts with no sentence saying what you think they show. Mood-only entries. Long narrative paragraphs. Your own diagnostic conclusions: describe the pattern and let the clinician name it. One formatting note matters more than it sounds: keep the dates in a column, in order, with the delayed-check column visible, so the lag is something they can see.
None of this is obvious on your own, and most people work it out alone. Welltory runs a paid community, Energy Lab, where women living with energy-limiting conditions learn to read their own tracked data together — education and peer support, not medical care.
Living with an activity and symptom diary: the questions people ask next
How do I keep a symptom diary when I work full time?
A work day is mostly cognitive, upright and social spending, which is what a step counter misses. Log work in two or three blocks rather than minute by minute — "4 h desk, sitting, cognitive; 1 h meetings, cognitive and social" — and be strict about the delayed check on the two days afterwards, because that is where the cost of a week shows up. NICE advises clinicians to discuss reasonable adjustments so people with ME/CFS may be able to continue or return to work (1), and a record of work days plus the 48 hours after them is strong evidence for that conversation.
Should I log exercise, and does the diary tell me when to do more?
Log it as a block like any other, with duration, position and type. Whether you then do more depends on your diagnosis, and this is where getting it wrong does harm. For ME/CFS, NICE advises against generalised exercise programmes and against any programme using fixed incremental increases, such as graded exercise therapy (1): activity is maintained, raised only after a period of stability, lowered again if symptoms worsen. For POTS, the 2015 Heart Rhythm Society consensus recommends a regular, structured, graduated and supervised programme, starting with non-upright exercise such as rowing machines, recumbent cycles and swimming (16). With post-exertional malaise on top of another diagnosis, the PEM rule applies.
What do I log on a crash day when I cannot write anything?
One number and one word: a severity rating and what kind of day it was. Everything else can be reconstructed later or left blank, and a blank is information too — a run of empty days marks an episode as clearly as a paragraph would. If someone is with you, ask them to write the line. The field to protect is the delayed check for the days before the crash, because that is what you cannot recover afterwards. Gaps do not ruin a diary; abandoning it because a crash broke the streak does.
How do I log a shower, heat, or a big event like travel or a wedding?
Log a shower as a real activity block, with what you did about each part — seated or standing, water temperature, whether you dried off sitting down — since it combines standing, heat, arm work and position changes, and heat goes in the context field beside it. Treat a big event as a multi-day entry: the days before, the event broken into blocks (travel time, upright time, noise, conversation), and the delayed check running for the full 72 hours afterwards, since symptoms can peak at that point (4). NICE recommends breaking activities into small chunks and building in pre-emptive rest (1), so the rest days before and after belong in the plan, not in the recovery.
Should I track food, alcohol and sleep in the same diary?
Sleep yes, as a short line: NICE includes sleep quality and duration in what an energy management plan should record (1), and a short night is one of the commonest reasons a quiet week looks expensive. Food and alcohol are a judgement call: a one-word note costs little, but adding a full food diary at the same time usually means both stop. A practical approach is to run the activity diary until you can read it, then add a food column only if you have a specific question.
My family thinks the diary is obsessive. How do I explain it?
Start from the delay. In ME/CFS and Long COVID with post-exertional malaise, the worsening typically arrives 12 to 48 hours after the effort (1), which is why "you seemed fine on Saturday" is not evidence that Saturday was free. CDC clinical guidance describes activity and symptom diaries as a way for people to identify their personal limitations (2), which helps if someone wants an official source rather than your word. It also helps to say what the diary is for: fewer crashes, not more restriction.
Is it bad for my mental health to track symptoms every day?
It can be, and it is worth watching for. Daily re-reading, hourly checking, or a record that has become a scoreboard you can fail are all signs to log less rather than more. The design here is deliberately small for that reason, and a weekly ten-minute review is usually enough. If checking numbers raises your anxiety instead of lowering it, cut back to the morning rating and the delayed check, and tell your clinician that monitoring itself has become a cost.
How to bring this up with your doctor
Say the delay out loud, first. "My symptoms get worse a day or two after effort, not during it — including after mental effort and appointments." That points the conversation toward post-exertional malaise rather than general tiredness, and the rest of your page is the evidence for it.
Bring the one-pager, not the diary. Six blocks, one side of paper. Keep the full record in your bag in case they ask.
Name the method. "This was logged daily, prospectively, with a check at 24, 48 and 72 hours." Prospective records are read differently from recalled ones, and if your clinician scores the DSQ, FUNCAP, FSS or MFIS, filling in theirs is worth more than bringing your own.
Ask about an energy management plan. NICE recommends helping people with ME/CFS develop one covering cognitive and physical activity, daily living, emotional and social demands, rest, sleep and environmental factors, and recommends referral to a physiotherapist or occupational therapist in an ME/CFS specialist team where there are difficulties with reduced activity or mobility (1).
Ask one question about any activity plan offered: "Does this increase on a schedule, or only when my symptoms have been stable?" A plan that advances by calendar regardless of delayed symptoms is not built for post-exertional malaise.
Do not attribute everything to the condition. Chest pain, fainting, breathlessness at rest, a new severe headache, sudden weakness on one side, or any sharp unexplained change need urgent assessment, not a line in your diary — call 911 in an emergency.
If you are dismissed, ask that your description of delayed worsening be recorded in your notes, and ask for a referral to someone with ME/CFS or Long COVID experience.
How Welltory helps — and what it cannot do
The limits first. Welltory is a general wellness product, not a medical device. It does not diagnose, predict, monitor, prevent, treat or mitigate ME/CFS, Long COVID, POTS, post-exertional malaise or any other condition. It is not a symptom tracker, it will not tell you where your limits are, and nothing in it can tell you that a crash is coming.
What it can do is keep a physiological record alongside the one you write yourself. A morning reading can be taken with your phone camera using photoplethysmography — a fingertip over the camera and flash, held still — or read from a compatible chest strap, Apple Watch or Samsung Watch. It is one snapshot and does not replace continuous heart-rate monitoring or an ECG.
1. Take the morning reading the same way each day — same position, before eating or showering — and write your morning energy rating on the same line in your diary. Heartbeat Report is built for morning readings under the same conditions, and resting heart rate and HRV only mean something against your own previous mornings.
2. Log what happened, in whatever way costs least. If you wear an Apple Watch or Oura, the Today screen (iOS) flags stress stretches and asks "What happened?". Tap a suggested tag, type a few words, or just talk — which matters on days when typing is the expensive part: "crash", "PEM day 2", "shower", "long call", "appointment", "noisy shop", "short night", "upright 3h". You can also add a note any time with the plus icon, and it goes into your Journal.
3. Look at the one to three days before, not the day of. Put your morning readings, resting heart rate, sleep analysis, stress minutes and Battery beside your diary for the 72 hours before a crash. Stress minutes and sleep analysis depend on a supported wearable; with the phone camera alone you have your spot readings. These are personal trends, not a verdict. If the numbers look fine and you feel awful, believe your body.
4. Check My Patterns (iOS) after two to three weeks of tagging. My Patterns collects the tags you add to stress and rest stretches on the Today screen, so it needs iOS with an Apple Watch or Oura. Patterns start to appear at around 7 tagged events, and insights typically need at least 7 occurrences of a tag in the current month plus some history from the month before. It shows which tagged situations tend to come with stressful stretches, rarer tags your body reacts strongly to, day-of-week trends, heart rate during those episodes, and every time a tag occurred.
5. Build the log you take to the appointment. The Journal shows HRV measurements, tags, mood and how you feel physically, notes, workouts and menstrual cycles synced from Apple Health, Samsung Health or Health Connect. For a longer record, export a CSV from the web app (Dashboard → choose a chart → Export). The free version keeps 30 days of data, so export what you want to keep.
Anything you find this way is an association to discuss with your doctor — not proof of a trigger, and not a warning system.
Where to learn this with other people. Welltory runs Energy Lab, a paid, moderated community for women aged 18 to 65 living with energy-limiting conditions — ME/CFS, Long COVID, fibromyalgia, POTS, MCAS and similar. It runs alongside the app: you keep collecting your own data, and the Lab is where members learn to read it together. Welltory's health educators and medical board answer questions from the group in plain language; there are no one-to-one consultations. It is education and peer support, not medical care, and it does not replace your own clinician.
How we made it
Made with AI tools, then edited and fact-checked by the Welltory team. See our Editorial & AI policy.
Data analysis by Jane Smorodnikova, co-founder of Welltory and the person who built the methodology behind how we read physiological data.
Written by Tatsiana Yashyna.


Discounts for blog readers: up to 36% off
See what affects your energy, stress, sleep, and daily state with Welltory
This article is educational and is not medical advice. A diary is not a diagnostic test and cannot confirm or rule out any condition. Condition-specific limits matter: NICE NG206 advises against graded exercise therapy and fixed incremental activity increases in ME/CFS, while structured, graduated exercise is recommended in POTS by the 2015 Heart Rhythm Society consensus — anyone with post-exertional malaise should follow the PEM rule and agree any activity plan with their own clinician. No medication doses are given. Welltory is a general wellness product, not a medical device: it does not diagnose, predict, monitor, prevent, treat or mitigate any condition, and no app or wearable can predict a post-exertional crash. New, changing or worsening symptoms need a clinician; chest pain, fainting, breathlessness at rest, a new severe headache or sudden one-sided weakness need urgent care — call 911 in an emergency. All sources retrieved on 6 October 2026.
Was this helpful?
Ask AI for a summary of page
Written by Jane Smorodnikova
The founder and CEO of Welltory. A recognized tech leader with two Master's degrees and experience at MIT, she has scaled Welltory to over 17 million users.
Written by Tatsiana Yashyna
References
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management (NG206). 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ME/CFS: treating the most disruptive symptoms first and preventing worsening of symptoms. https://www.cdc.gov/me-cfs/hcp/clinical-care/treating-the-most-disruptive-symptoms-first-and-preventing-worsening-of-symptoms.html
- Chu L, Valencia IJ, Garvert DW, Montoya JG. Deconstructing post-exertional malaise in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient-centered, cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0197811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197811
- Stussman B, Williams A, Snow J, et al. Characterization of post-exertional malaise in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Frontiers in Neurology 2020;11:1025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.01025
- Jason L, Benton M, Torres-Harding S, Muldowney K. The impact of energy modulation on physical functioning and fatigue severity among patients with ME/CFS. Patient Education and Counseling 2009;77(2):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.015
- Jason LA, Timpo P, Porter N, Herrington J, Brown M, Torres-Harding S, Friedberg F. Activity logs as a measure of daily activity among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Mental Health 2009;18(6):549–556. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638230903191249
- Jason LA, Brown M. Sub-typing daily fatigue progression in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Mental Health 2013;22(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.670879
- Sanal-Hayes NEM, Hayes LD, Mair J, et al. A digital platform with activity tracking for energy management support in long COVID: a randomised controlled trial. Nature Communications 2026;17:945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64831-y
- Jason LA, Sunnquist M. The development of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire: original, expanded, brief, and pediatric versions. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2018;6:330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00330
- Cotler J, Holtzman C, Dudun C, Jason LA. A brief questionnaire to assess post-exertional malaise. Diagnostics 2018;8(3):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8030066
- Sommerfelt K, Schei T, Seton KA, Carding SR. Assessing functional capacity in myalgic encephalopathy/chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient-informed questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024;13(12):3486. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123486
- Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The Fatigue Severity Scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Archives of Neurology 1989;46(10):1121–1123. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022
- Larson RD. Psychometric properties of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. International Journal of MS Care 2013;15(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2012-019
- Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled Clinical Trials 2003;24(2):182–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00320-3
- Singh Ospina N, Phillips KA, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, et al. Eliciting the patient's agenda — secondary analysis of recorded clinical encounters. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2019;34(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4540-5
- Sheldon RS, Grubb BP, Olshansky B, et al. 2015 Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm 2015;12(6):e41–e63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.029










