22 min read
5.0
4

Energy envelope: how to find your baseline for pacing with ME/CFS and Long COVID

Leonard Jason's energy envelope theory compares the energy you feel you have with the energy you spend. Because post-exertional malaise typically arrives 12 to 48 hours late, the only reliable way to find your baseline is a short written record — read against yourself, not against a chart.

Jane Smorodnikova
Founder & CEO
Tatsiana Yashyna
Deputy COO
An evidence-first guide to the energy envelope, the pacing concept from Leonard Jason's group at DePaul University: keep the energy you spend close to the energy you feel you have, avoiding both over- and under-exertion. Summarises the research in a table — a 2008 correlational study, a 2009 follow-up in which the 49 of 81 adults who stayed within their envelope improved in physical functioning and fatigue over 12 months while the 32 who did not showed no significant change, a 2011 study of 44 adults, a 2019 analysis of 434 people, a 2023 Long COVID pacing cohort of 31, and a 2023 scoping review of 17 studies with mixed results. Explains why the limit cannot be felt in the moment: post-exertional malaise typically worsens 12 to 48 hours later and can peak by 72. Gives a one-to-two-week diary method with 0–100 ratings, a simple energy quotient, delayed checks and clean days; explains personal versus population baselines using HRV literature; covers micropacing, boom-and-bust, NICE's advice against graded exercise therapy in ME/CFS, and what to bring to a doctor.

Short answer

The energy envelope is the amount of physical, mental and emotional activity you can do without triggering post-exertional malaise (PEM), the delayed crash of ME/CFS and Long COVID. Energy envelope theory, developed by psychologist Leonard Jason, holds that people do better when spent energy matches available energy. Because PEM typically worsens 12 to 48 hours later, you find your baseline from a one- to two-week diary, not today's feeling.

Before you blame yourself, check what your body already recorded. If you crashed after a day that felt completely manageable, you are not imagining the link, and it is not weakness or poor discipline: the delay between effort and cost is the documented core of PEM, and it is exactly why a written record finds your limits better than willpower does.

Note: this article explains a self-management approach and is not medical advice. The energy envelope is not a diagnosis, and pacing is not a cure. New, changing or worsening symptoms need a clinician, because several treatable conditions can look like an energy-limiting illness.

What is the energy envelope?

The idea is simple enough to fit on a sticky note: spend no more energy than you have. The work is in the two words hiding inside it — spend and have — because in ME/CFS and Long COVID neither is easy to measure by feel.

The term comes from research at DePaul University in Chicago. Leonard Jason's group began collecting hour-by-hour activity and fatigue data from people with ME/CFS in 1993. According to Jason's own history of the work, the phrase "energy envelope" was suggested by a participant in the team's volunteer buddy programme, and the first papers on the theory appeared in 1997 and 1999 (3).

The theory rests on two self-ratings, usually on a 0–100 scale where 100 means the energy you had when you were fully well:

  • Available (perceived) energy — how much you feel you have to work with.

  • Expended energy — how much you actually spent, across everything you did.

Staying "within the envelope" means keeping the second close to the first. Jason's team described it as a comfortable range that avoids both over-exertion and under-exertion — a detail that often gets lost (2). The envelope is not an instruction to do as little as possible. It is an instruction to stop the overspending that produces crashes, so that activity can be sustained.

The concept is now mainstream. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes that "some patients and healthcare providers refer to staying within these limits as staying within the 'energy envelope'," and advises that people determine their individual limits for mental and physical activity (8). The UK's NICE guideline on ME/CFS (NG206, 2021) uses the phrase "energy limit" for the same thing, and says each person has "a different and fluctuating energy limit" and is the expert in judging it (7).

Pacing is the practice; the energy envelope is the budget it works to. If you want the wider picture of pacing approaches — spoons, heart-rate ceilings, diaries, morning checks — our guide to pacing for chronic illness compares them side by side.

What does the research on energy envelope theory show?

More than most people expect, and less than advocates sometimes claim. The findings point in one direction, but the studies are small, mostly observational and built on self-report.

StudyWho took partWhat was measuredWhat it foundKeep in mind
Jason et al., 2008 (1)Adults with ME/CFSDaily energy quotient: expended ÷ perceived × 100Higher quotients went with more fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression and disabilityCorrelational
Jason et al., 2009 (2)81 adults, followed for 12 monthsWeekly 0–100 ratings; "within" = quotient of 150 or lessThe 49 who stayed within improved in physical functioning and fatigue; the 32 who did not showed no significant changePeople sorted by behaviour, not randomised; housebound patients excluded
Brown, Khorana & Jason, 2011 (4)44 adultsEnvelope status before treatmentThose within their envelope beforehand improved more afterwardsSmall sample
O'Connor et al., 2019 (5)434 adults from four samplesEnergy items of the DePaul Symptom QuestionnaireMore available energy meant better functioning — but the advantage shrank in people who overexertedCross-sectional snapshot
Parker et al., 2023 (12)31 adults with Long COVID, 6 weeksA structured pacing protocolAverage post-exertional episodes fell from 3.4 in week 1 to 1.1 in week 6No control group
Sanal-Hayes et al., 2023 (11)17 studies of pacing in ME/CFSScoping review11 reported benefit, 4 no effect, 2 a worse outcome than controlAuthors call the evidence too thin to set practice

Two findings are worth pulling out.

The 2009 follow-up is the closest thing to a test of the theory. 114 adults enrolled in a trial of non-drug interventions; 81 had energy ratings at the start and at 12 months. The researchers then split them by whether their weekly quotient at follow-up was 150 or less. Only the group that stayed near its envelope improved over the year in physical functioning and fatigue severity (2). It is an association, not proof that the envelope caused the change, but it is the pattern the theory expects.

The 2019 analysis adds a useful twist. People with more available energy functioned better, as you would expect — yet overexertion blunted that advantage most in exactly this group (5). In plain terms: the better your baseline, the more you have to lose by spending past it.

Guidelines have moved in the same direction. NICE recommends energy management as a self-management strategy covering "all types of activity (cognitive, physical, emotional and social)", and it states that activity should never be automatically increased — only maintained, or adjusted upward after a period of stability (7). A 2012 consensus paper co-authored by Jason made the same case for pacing as a way to stabilise the condition and avoid post-exertional malaise (6).

Why can't you feel where your envelope ends?

Because the bill arrives after you have left the shop.

In ordinary tiredness, cost and cause sit close together: you feel it while you do it, and you recover overnight. In post-exertional malaise they come apart. NICE describes symptoms that "typically worsen 12 to 48 hours after activity and last for days or even weeks" (7), and the CDC uses the same window (8).

Studies that asked patients directly show how variable that delay is. In a survey of 150 people with ME/CFS, onset and duration varied for most, but 84% said a crash lasted 24 hours or more, and 11% reported a consistent delay of at least a day before it began (9). In focus groups led by researchers at the US National Institutes of Health, 17 of 18 participants who described their symptoms after an exercise test said symptoms started within 24 hours and peaked within 72 (10). Jason's own early diary work found that today's fatigue was related to the energy people reported spending two days earlier (3).

That is why "listen to your body" is poor advice on its own here. By the time the body speaks, the spending happened a day or two ago. Our explainer on post-exertional malaise covers the timing in more depth.

The second reason is that the envelope is spent through more than one tap. The Chu survey found that 90% of respondents had post-exertional malaise after physical exertion, cognitive exertion and emotional distress alike (9). Four kinds of spending are worth counting separately:

  • Physical — walking, housework, showering, carrying, standing to cook.

  • Cognitive — reading, email, screens, decisions, conversations that need attention.

  • Upright time — sitting and standing ask the circulation to work against gravity, which matters if you also have orthostatic symptoms.

  • Emotional and sensory — conflict, appointments, noise, bright light, crowds.

A day of "doing nothing" that included a difficult phone call, two hours upright at a table and a noisy waiting room was not a rest day. That is the puzzle our article on crashing with a step count of zero takes apart.

How do you find your baseline in one to two weeks?

Your baseline is the level of activity you can repeat day after day without a delayed worsening. The method below uses the same two ratings as the research, a record of what you did, and — the part people skip — a look back one, two and three days later.

Week one is a measurement week, not a change week. Do what you would do anyway and write it down. You are looking for the shape of your current envelope, not trying to improve it yet.

WhenWhat to recordExample
Morning, before getting upAvailable energy, 0–100; one line on how you feel"35 — heavy legs, head clear"
Through the dayActivity in blocks: what, how long, body position, which kind of spending"20 min email, sitting — cognitive"
EveningExpended energy, 0–100; anything unusual (bad night, infection, heat, a hard conversation)"55 — longer call than planned"
24, 48 and 72 hours laterWorse, same or better than usual; which symptoms"Thursday: worse — fog, sore throat"
OptionalA morning heart-rate or HRV reading taken the same way each day"Resting HR, lying down, before coffee"

At the end of each day, a rough quotient helps. Divide expended by available and multiply by 100. Available 40 and expended 60 gives 150 — you spent half as much again as you felt you had. A figure close to 100 means balance. Treat it as a way of making the gap visible, not a score to hit: the 2009 study used 150 or less as its cut-off (2), while the 2019 analysis treated roughly 93 to 120 as within (5). Neither is a clinical threshold.

Then look for clean days. After one to two weeks, mark every day whose following 72 hours showed no delayed worsening. Those days are the evidence. What they have in common — how much upright time, how many cognitive blocks, how long the longest single activity lasted — is your current baseline.

Set your starting level below it, not at it. NICE's energy management advice for ME/CFS is to agree "a sustainable level of activity as the first step, which may mean reducing activity", to plan rest periods including pre-emptive rest, and to break activities into small chunks (7). Starting under the line gives you a margin for the days when something unplanned happens, which is most days.

Use a one-sentence test. An activity is inside your envelope if you can do it today and still feel roughly the same tomorrow and the day after. If you can do it once but pay for it later, it is outside, however easy it felt at the time.

The limit of any device is worth stating plainly: we are not aware of any validated algorithm that can predict an individual crash. The diary is not a lesser substitute for technology. For now it is the main instrument.

Personal baseline vs population norm: why your numbers only make sense against you

Almost every number you meet in pacing — an energy rating, a resting heart rate, an HRV reading — is more useful compared with your own usual than with a chart of what is "normal".

The HRV literature shows why. A systematic review of short-term HRV in healthy adults pooled 44 studies and 21,438 participants and found large differences between individuals — for some spectral measures, up to 260,000% (13). A population range that wide tells you very little about whether this morning is a good morning for you. Sports scientists who monitor HRV day to day came to the same conclusion from the other direction: working with elite endurance athletes, they recommend averaging techniques rather than reacting to single readings, and describe each athlete's individual HRV "fingerprint" that only longitudinal monitoring reveals (14).

The energy envelope works the same way. A 40 on your scale is not someone else's 40, and the ratings only mean something when they are made the same way, at the same time, by the same person. That is also why the research sets the ratings against each other — expended versus available — rather than against a population table.

Three practical consequences follow:

  • Compare with a week, not a day. A single morning tells you little on its own; a direction held over several days is worth taking seriously.

  • Expect the baseline to move. NICE describes the limit as fluctuating (7). An infection, a stretch of bad sleep or a crash can lower it, sometimes for weeks. Re-measure after any of these rather than assuming last month's envelope still fits.

  • Be wary of scores built on other people. Many consumer "readiness" and "recovery" scores were developed with healthy or athletic users in mind, and a reading can look fine while you are not.

When the numbers and your body disagree, go with your body. A morning reading is one more voice in the conversation, not the one that settles it — our guide to using morning HRV for pacing goes through how to read one next to how you feel.

What is micropacing, and when is it needed?

For people with severe ME/CFS or a very small envelope, the question is not whether to take a walk. It is how to get washed without losing the afternoon.

Micropacing means cutting every task — including the ones a well person would not call tasks — into short segments, with rest between them that starts before you feel you need it. NICE describes the same principle in general terms: break activities into small chunks, alternate different types of activity, and build in pre-emptive rest (7).

A shower is the classic example, because it combines standing, heat, arm work and changes of position. Micropacing it means splitting it into parts with rest in between and doing as much as possible seated or lying down — which parts, and how long each rest is, depends on what your own diary shows. Written out, it can look excessive; for someone with a very small envelope, it can be the difference between a shower and a lost afternoon.

The same logic applies to screens and conversation: one email, then eyes closed for a couple of minutes; one short call rather than three back to back; cooking in stages with sitting or lying down between them. A timer helps, because the signal to stop needs to come from outside — the internal sense of "I'm fine, just five more minutes" is the least reliable reading of all.

Energy envelope, spoons and heart-rate pacing compared

Most people end up combining methods. The table shows what each counts and where it runs out.

ApproachWhat it countsWhat you needGood atLimits
Spoon theoryUnits of energy per day, as a metaphorNothingExplaining limits to other peopleDoes not capture the delayed cost
Energy envelopeAvailable vs expended energy, rated dailyA diary and a 0–100 scaleFinding a baseline over weeksSelf-rated; takes a week or two before it helps
Heart-rate pacingTime spent above a personal heart-rate ceilingA continuous heart-rate wearable with alertsShowing exertion as it happensCeilings are estimates; less useful if standing alone raises your pulse a lot
Morning HRV checkOne reading compared with your own usualPhone camera or a compatible deviceA quick look at the morning before you plan the dayOne snapshot; not continuous monitoring

Spoon theory was created by Christine Miserandino, who described it in her 2003 essay "The Spoon Theory" on butyoudontlooksick.com. It is the best tool for making someone else understand why you cannot do one more thing; our spoon theory explainer covers how people use it. The energy envelope adds what spoons leave out: a record, a ratio and the time lag.

Heart-rate pacing uses a wearable to keep effort under a ceiling in real time; the resting-plus-15 beats-per-minute figure often quoted in patient communities is a heuristic, not a measured threshold. Our heart-rate pacing guide explains where the numbers come from and what they need.

These are complementary. The envelope tells you roughly how big your budget is. A heart-rate alert tells you when you are spending fast. A diary tells you, two days later, whether it was too much. If you are choosing tools, our comparison of pacing apps sets out what each one needs and where your data lives.

Boom and bust: why the good day is the risky one

The CDC warns about "push and crash" cycles, which happen "when patients try to do too much on a 'good day' to make up for 'lost time'" (8). The good morning feels like evidence that the envelope has grown. Often it is just a morning.

A rule that helps: on a good day, do what your baseline says, not what the morning says. Bank the good day as a margin rather than spending it. If it turns out to be the start of a real improvement, it will still be there next week.

Can the envelope get bigger? In Jason's 16-month case study, a participant who kept expended energy close to available energy saw both rise gradually over time while fatigue fell (3). NICE describes the same slow path: activity maintained, then adjusted upward only after a period of stability, over weeks, months or sometimes years (7).

What this is not. Expanding the envelope is not graded exercise therapy. NICE (2021) advises against offering people with ME/CFS any programme that uses fixed incremental increases in physical activity, including graded exercise therapy, and against generalised exercise programmes designed for healthy people or other illnesses (7). This advice is specific to ME/CFS and to post-exertional malaise. Graded activity is used in some other conditions, such as many chronic pain programmes and some POTS rehabilitation without PEM — and that is a different situation, to be decided with your own clinician. If you have post-exertional malaise, the rule is the same whatever your diagnosis is called: no increase until the current level has been stable, and every increase undone if a delayed worsening follows.

None of this is obvious on your own, and most people work it out alone. Welltory runs a paid community, Energy Lab, where women living with energy-limiting conditions learn to read their own tracked data together — education and peer support, not medical care.

Living with the energy envelope: the questions people ask next

Can I keep working inside my energy envelope?

Some people can, often with changes. Staying within the energy envelope at work usually means counting work as cognitive, upright and emotional spending, not just physical, and protecting recovery time around it. NICE advises clinicians to discuss reasonable adjustments at work and to liaise with employers with the person's consent, and it acknowledges there may be times when someone cannot continue working (7). Useful adjustments people ask about include remote days, fewer meetings, the option to lie down, and flexible hours. A two-week diary of work days and the 48 hours after them is strong evidence when you ask for them.

Does a shower really count against my energy envelope?

Yes. A shower combines standing, heat, arm movements and position changes, and for people with a small energy envelope it can be one of the most expensive tasks of the day. NICE recommends breaking activities into small chunks and building in pre-emptive rest (7), which is what a micropaced shower does: sitting, pauses with the water off, drying and dressing seated or lying down. If a shower reliably leaves you worse later in the day or the next day, log it in your diary as a real activity block — it is one.

Do emotions and socialising use up the energy envelope?

They do. In a survey of 150 people with ME/CFS, 90% reported post-exertional malaise after emotional distress as well as physical and cognitive exertion (9), and NICE includes emotional and social activity in energy management (7). That does not mean giving up people. It means budgeting a visit the way you would budget a walk: shorter, sitting or lying down, in a quiet place, with a rest day planned after anything big like a family event or a trip.

Is the energy envelope the same for POTS, fibromyalgia or Long COVID?

The principle of spending within your limits applies widely, but the details differ by condition. The energy envelope research was done in ME/CFS (2). In Long COVID with post-exertional symptoms, a small 2023 study found fewer episodes after six weeks of structured pacing (12). In conditions without post-exertional malaise — some POTS and many chronic pain programmes — clinicians may use graded activity, which NICE advises against in ME/CFS (7). The deciding question is whether you have delayed worsening after exertion; ask your clinician which approach fits you.

What if my energy envelope is tiny, or I'm mostly in bed?

Then the energy envelope still applies, at a finer scale. NICE describes people with severe ME/CFS as mostly housebound or bedbound and often very sensitive to light and sound (7); for them, sensory input, sitting up and short conversations are real spending. Micropacing — tasks in seconds or minutes, rest before you feel you need it — becomes the main tool. Tracking should cost as little as possible: a single morning rating spoken to someone, or one line in a note. Note that most envelope studies excluded housebound people (2), so the research tells you least about this group.

Is staying in my energy envelope just giving up?

No. Jason's team described staying within the energy envelope as avoiding both over-exertion and under-exertion (2), and NICE frames energy management as a long-term approach that can, over weeks, months or years, lead to stabilisation or increased tolerance (7). A system that keeps crashing spends its reserves on recovering from crashes. Fewer crashes is progress, even when the calendar does not look busier yet. Pacing is not a cure, but it is also not a surrender.

How do I explain my energy envelope to family?

Start with a picture they already know. Christine Miserandino's spoon theory, from her 2003 essay on butyoudontlooksick.com, works well for "I have a fixed number of spoons today." Then add the part spoons leave out: the bill comes a day or two later, so "you looked fine on Saturday" is not evidence that Saturday was free. CDC materials describe staying within these limits as staying within the energy envelope (8), which can help when someone wants an official source.

How to bring this up with your doctor

A diary makes a short appointment go much further, because it turns "I get worse after doing things" into dates, activities and durations.

Say it in one sentence first: "When I do more than a certain amount, I get worse one to two days later, and it lasts several days." That describes post-exertional malaise without needing the term, and it points the conversation toward assessment for ME/CFS or Long COVID rather than general tiredness.

Bring a one-page summary of two weeks, not the whole diary: your morning ratings, the days you went over, what the next 72 hours looked like, and your best estimate of a sustainable day. Add any heart-rate or HRV trends you have, labelled as personal trends.

Ask about energy management support. NICE recommends an individual energy management plan, and referral to a physiotherapist or occupational therapist in an ME/CFS specialist team for people who have difficulties with reduced activity or mobility, or who want to build up physical activity (7).

Ask one question about any activity or exercise plan you are offered: "Is this plan fixed, or does it adjust if I get worse a day or two later?" A plan that advances on a calendar regardless of delayed symptoms is not designed for post-exertional malaise.

Be careful with testing that provokes exertion. A two-day cardiopulmonary exercise test can document the problem objectively, but it can itself cause a serious and sometimes lasting worsening, so it is a decision to make with a specialist, not a routine check.

If you are dismissed, ask that your description of delayed worsening be recorded in your notes, and ask for a referral to someone with ME/CFS or Long COVID experience.

And do not put these down to pacing: chest pain, fainting, breathlessness at rest, a new severe headache, or sudden weakness on one side need urgent care — call 911 in an emergency.

How Welltory helps — and what it cannot do

The limits first. Welltory is a general wellness product, not a medical device. It does not diagnose, predict, monitor, prevent, treat or mitigate ME/CFS, Long COVID, POTS, post-exertional malaise or any other condition, and it cannot tell you where your energy envelope is. What it can do is keep a physiological record next to your own.

For pacing there are several approaches: heart-rate pacing with a wearable, spoon theory, a symptom diary. Welltory adds a morning HRV check you can take with your phone camera — a physiological signal to set beside your own estimate of how much you have today, not a verdict on it. A camera reading uses photoplethysmography: a fingertip over the camera and flash for a short, still measurement. It is one snapshot, it needs you to be still, and it cannot replace continuous heart-rate monitoring or an ECG. Welltory can also read measurements from a compatible chest strap, Apple Watch or Samsung Watch. Our article on how accurate HRV from a phone camera is covers the evidence.

A routine that fits the energy envelope method:

1. Take the morning reading the same way each day — same position, before eating or showering — and write your 0–100 available-energy rating next to it. Heartbeat Report is designed for morning readings under the same conditions.

2. Log what happened. If you wear an Apple Watch or Oura, the Today screen (iOS) flags stress stretches and asks "What happened?". Tap a suggested tag, type a few words, or just talk: "crash", "PEM", "long call", "shower", "short night", "period day 1". You can also add a note any time with the plus icon ("Share your thoughts…"); it goes into your Journal.

3. Look at the days before a crash, not just the day of it. Put the morning HRV reading, resting heart rate, sleep, stress minutes and Battery beside your diary for the 72 hours before (stress minutes and sleep analysis depend on a supported wearable; with the phone camera alone you have your spot readings). These are personal trends to compare with how you felt. If the data looks fine and you feel awful, believe your body.

4. Check My Patterns (iOS) after two to three weeks of tagging. My Patterns collects the tags you add to stress and rest stretches on the Today screen, so it needs iOS with an Apple Watch or Oura; a phone-camera reading on its own does not create these stretches. Patterns start to show at around 7 tagged events, and insights typically need at least 7 occurrences of a tag in the current month plus some history from the month before. It shows which tagged situations tend to come with stressful stretches, rarer tags your body reacts to strongly, day-of-week trends, heart rate during those episodes, and every time the tag occurred. Some sections need a paid plan.

5. Build a log for your doctor. The Journal shows HRV measurements, tags, mood and how you feel physically, notes, workouts and menstrual cycles synced from Apple Health, Samsung Health or Health Connect. For a longer record, export a CSV from the web app (Dashboard → choose a chart → Export) and bring it with your own diary. The free version keeps 30 days of data, so export what you want to keep.

Any patterns you find are associations to discuss with your doctor — not proof of a trigger, and not a warning system.

Where to learn this with other people. Welltory runs Energy Lab, a paid, moderated community for women aged 18 to 65 living with energy-limiting conditions — ME/CFS, Long COVID, fibromyalgia, POTS, MCAS and similar. It runs alongside the app: you keep collecting your own data, and the Lab is where members learn to read it together. Welltory's health educators and medical board answer questions from the group in plain language; there are no one-to-one consultations. It is education and peer support, not medical care, and it does not replace your own clinician.

How we made it

Made with AI tools, then edited and fact-checked by the Welltory team. See our Editorial & AI policy.

Data analysis by Jane Smorodnikova, co-founder of Welltory and the person who built the methodology behind how we read physiological data.

Written by Tatsiana Yashyna.

Discounts for blog readers: up to 36% off

See what affects your energy, stress, sleep, and daily state with Welltory

This article is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. The energy envelope is a self-management concept, not a diagnosis, and pacing does not cure any condition. Graded exercise therapy is not recommended for ME/CFS (NICE NG206, 2021); advice for other conditions may differ and should come from your own clinician. No app or wearable can tell you where your energy envelope is or when a crash will come. Welltory is a general wellness product, not a medical device, and does not diagnose, predict, monitor, prevent, treat or mitigate ME/CFS, Long COVID, POTS, post-exertional malaise or any other condition. New, changing or worsening symptoms need clinical assessment. Sources were retrieved on 1 October 2026.

Was this helpful?

Ask AI for a summary of page

ChatGPTGeminiClaudePerplexityGrok

Written by Jane Smorodnikova

The founder and CEO of Welltory. A recognized tech leader with two Master's degrees and experience at MIT, she has scaled Welltory to over 17 million users.

Written by Tatsiana Yashyna

Deputy COO at Welltory. With a background in medicine and years of working with health data, she translates research and real physiological signals — sleep, stress, heart rate, and hormones — into clear, evidence-based explanations that help people understand what their bodies are telling them.

References

  1. Jason L, Muldowney K, Torres-Harding S. The Energy Envelope Theory and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. AAOHN Journal 2008;56(5):189–195. https://doi.org/10.3928/08910162-20080501-06
  2. Jason L, Benton M, Torres-Harding S, Muldowney K. The impact of energy modulation on physical functioning and fatigue severity among patients with ME/CFS. Patient Education and Counseling 2009;77(2):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.015
  3. Jason LA, Brown M, Brown A, et al. Energy conservation/envelope theory interventions to help patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior 2013;1(1–2):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2012.733602
  4. Brown M, Khorana N, Jason LA. The role of changes in activity as a function of perceived available and expended energy in nonpharmacological treatment outcomes for ME/CFS. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2011;67(3):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20744
  5. O'Connor K, Sunnquist M, Nicholson L, Jason LA, Newton JL, Strand EB. Energy envelope maintenance among patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome: implications of limited energy reserves. Chronic Illness 2019;15(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317746470
  6. Goudsmit EM, Nijs J, Jason LA, Wallman KE. Pacing as a strategy to improve energy management in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a consensus document. Disability and Rehabilitation 2012;34(13):1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.635746
  7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management (NG206). 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ME/CFS: strategies to prevent worsening of symptoms. Last reviewed 10 May 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/me-cfs/hcp/clinical-care/treating-the-most-disruptive-symptoms-first-and-preventing-worsening-of-symptoms.html
  9. Chu L, Valencia IJ, Garvert DW, Montoya JG. Deconstructing post-exertional malaise in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient-centered, cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0197811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197811
  10. Stussman B, Williams A, Snow J, et al. Characterization of post-exertional malaise in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Frontiers in Neurology 2020;11:1025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.01025
  11. Sanal-Hayes NEM, Mclaughlin M, Hayes LD, et al. A scoping review of 'Pacing' for management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): lessons learned for the long COVID pandemic. Journal of Translational Medicine 2023;21:720. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04587-5
  12. Parker M, Sawant HB, Flannery T, et al. Effect of using a structured pacing protocol on post-exertional symptom exacerbation and health status in a longitudinal cohort with the post-COVID-19 syndrome. Journal of Medical Virology 2023;95(1):e28373. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28373
  13. Nunan D, Sandercock GRH, Brodie DA. A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 2010;33(11):1407–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02841.x
  14. Plews DJ, Laursen PB, Stanley J, Kilding AE, Buchheit M. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Medicine 2013;43(9):773–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0071-8

FAQ