Boom and bust: why the good day is the one that costs you, and how to break the cycle
A better day arrives, you clear the backlog, and the bill lands 12 to 48 hours later. This is how the boom and bust cycle keeps itself running — and why the fix is different in ME/CFS than in fibromyalgia, chronic pain or FND.

Short answer
The boom and bust cycle is the pattern where a better-than-usual day leads you to clear the backlog, the cost lands a day or two later, and the forced rest that follows leaves you with a smaller baseline and a longer to-do list than before. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls the same thing a "push and crash" cycle, which happens when people "try to do too much on a 'good day' to make up for 'lost time'" (2). It is self-reinforcing, and trying harder is what keeps it running.
If you have been told you lack discipline, the research points the other way. In chronic pain, the people who cycle hardest tend to be the ones who persist through symptoms rather than avoid them (13), and in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long COVID the bill for Monday can arrive on Wednesday (1). That is not laziness and not a character flaw. Both are reasons a written record works better than willpower.
Note: this article explains a self-management pattern and is not medical advice. Boom and bust is not a diagnosis, and the right response to it depends on which condition you have. New, changing or worsening symptoms need a clinician, because several treatable conditions can look like an energy-limiting illness.
What is the boom and bust cycle in chronic illness?
A point of confusion first. Search the phrase and most of what comes back is economics — the business cycle, housing markets, mining towns. That is a different "boom and bust". The one here is a pattern of activity and symptoms, and in clinical settings it goes by several names depending on who is writing:
Push and crash — the term the CDC uses for ME/CFS (2).
Boom-bust activity cycles — the phrase in the UK consensus recommendations for physiotherapy in functional motor disorder (10).
Overdoing-underdoing cycling — the wording used in the activity-pacing measurement literature for chronic pain (15).
Overactivity — the chronic pain research term, defined as activity engagement that significantly exacerbates pain, resulting in periods of incapacity (13).
All four describe the same shape: a stretch of doing more than your body can carry, followed by a stretch of doing much less than you want to, repeated.
What makes it worth a whole article is that the shape is the same across conditions while the thing that happens in the "bust" is not. In ME/CFS and Long COVID with post-exertional malaise (PEM), the bust is a delayed, disproportionate worsening of the whole illness. In fibromyalgia, chronic pain and functional neurological disorder (FND), it is a pain or symptom flare with different physiology and a different treatment logic. Mixing the two up is the most common way the advice goes wrong. Our guide to pacing for chronic illness sets out how each condition's guidelines differ; this article goes deep on the cycle itself.
How does the boom and bust loop actually work, step by step?
Drawn out, it has six stages, and each one makes the next more likely.
1. A better day arrives. Symptoms lift slightly. Sleep was less broken, the weather changed, a bad week ended. Nothing about it feels like a warning.
2. The backlog is still there. The email, the laundry, the friend you have cancelled on twice, the work you promised. On a bad day you cannot touch it. On a better day you can, and there is an obvious moral case for doing so.
3. You spend past your limit without noticing. This is the step the cycle depends on. In a 5-day observational study, 68 adults with chronic pain wore an activity monitor and rated pain six times a day. Those who scored high on habitual overactivity showed more variation in both pain and objectively measured activity across days, and their data repeatedly showed prolonged activity engagement followed by significant pain increases (13). The pattern is visible in the record even when it was not visible at the time.
4. The cost lands late. In ME/CFS and Long COVID, NICE describes symptoms that "typically worsen 12 to 48 hours after activity and last for days or even weeks" (1), and in a survey of 150 people with ME/CFS, 84% said a crash lasted 24 hours or more (3). Measurement supports the delay: in 68 people with Long COVID who did two submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests 24 hours apart, oxygen uptake at the first ventilatory threshold was lower on day two, as was the work rate they reached at that point (8). Something measurable had got worse overnight.
5. Forced rest, plus guilt. You cancel. You lie down. Depending on the condition, this lasts a day or three weeks. The rest is not chosen, which is part of why it does not feel restorative, and it comes with a running commentary about letting people down.
6. The baseline settles lower, and the backlog is bigger. This is where the loop closes. In chronic pain, a meta-analysis of 41 studies found avoidance of activity consistently associated with more pain, poorer psychological functioning and more physical disability (11) — the long trough has its own cost. In ME/CFS, repeated PEM is what the guidance is built to prevent, because each episode can set the energy limit lower (1). Either way, the next good day arrives with more to catch up on and less capacity to do it with.
That is why the cycle is self-reinforcing rather than merely repetitive: each turn makes the "boom" more tempting and the body less able to carry it.
Why doesn't willpower break the cycle — and why does trying harder make it worse?
Three reasons, and they stack.
The feedback arrives too late to teach you anything. Learning needs the consequence to follow the action closely enough to be connected to it. When the worsening is 12 to 48 hours behind the effort (1), the day you feel terrible is a day you may have done almost nothing. The lesson your body takes is not "Tuesday was too much" but "this illness is random". That is the problem our article on post-exertional malaise takes apart, and the reason a day of rest can still end in a crash — see crashing with a step count of zero.
The behaviour is often older than the illness. Two qualitative studies of habitually overactive people with chronic pain found participants believed the behaviour was part of who they were before pain started: high activity levels beforehand, identification with being hard-working, perfectionistic traits, and aspects of psychological inflexibility (14). Telling someone with that history to try harder to stop asks them to use the exact trait that produces the problem.
Pacing education on its own often does not change it. That same research followed participants 3 to 6 months after a pain management programme. Some had learned pacing with professional support and described a meaningful improvement. But most reported difficulty changing their behaviour after treatment, and the authors concluded that pacing education alone may not be enough to produce behaviour change in habitually overactive people (14).
There is a fourth, quieter reason: the "boom" is rarely frivolous. It is a shower, a child's school play, a shift you cannot afford to miss, a funeral. The cycle runs on obligation, not indulgence, and obligation is much harder to argue with.
Is the "bust" the same in ME/CFS as in fibromyalgia or FND?
No, and this is the part that changes what you should do. The behaviour looks identical from the outside; the physiology and the treatment logic do not.
| Condition | What the "bust" is | Typical timing | What the guidance says about increasing activity | Keep in mind |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ME/CFS | Post-exertional malaise: disproportionate worsening of the whole illness after minimal cognitive, physical, emotional or social activity | Typically 12–48 hours later, lasting days or weeks (1) | NICE advises against any programme using fixed incremental increases, including graded exercise therapy; activity is never increased automatically, only after a period of stability (1) | The strongest statement here, and it applies whether or not you feel able |
| Long COVID with PEM | Post-exertional symptom exacerbation, with measurable physiological change | Day-two decrements 24 hours after submaximal exercise (8) | A 2024 best-practice proposal from 14 international experts stratifies exercise recommendations by whether PEM is absent, mild/moderate or severe (9) | PEM affects about a third of people with Long COVID (8); the rest are a different situation |
| Fibromyalgia | A pain and symptom flare, often with poor sleep and cognitive symptoms | Hours to days; highly variable | EULAR's revised recommendations make exercise the only "strong for" therapy-based recommendation, based on meta-analyses (16) | Do not import the ME/CFS rule here. If you also have PEM, the PEM rule applies on top |
| Chronic pain generally | Pain exacerbation followed by a period of incapacity (13) | Same day to a few days | Operant activity pacing — quotas by amount, time or goal rather than symptom severity — is advised, with gradual progression (12) | Avoidance is linked to worse outcomes than persistence on most measures (11) |
| Functional neurological disorder | Symptom flare, plus the fatigue and pain that commonly accompany FND | Variable | The physiotherapy consensus recommends self-management plans including "pacing, graded activity and exercise plans to prevent boom-bust activity cycles" (10) | The same document describes breaking over-activity/under-activity cycles with graded exercise where pain and fatigue coexist (10) |
The literature makes the split formally. When reviewers assembled the evidence on operant activity pacing for chronic pain in 2026 — pacing by quotas rather than by symptoms — they explicitly excluded interventions based on energy conservation, energy envelope theory, adaptive pacing therapy or symptom-contingency (12). Those belong to the ME/CFS tradition and are counted separately. Two bodies of evidence, two logics, one word.
The practical consequence. If your bust is post-exertional malaise, breaking the cycle means lowering and flattening activity and increasing only after a stable stretch, with every increase reversed if delayed worsening follows. If your bust is a pain flare without PEM, it usually means flattening activity first and then building it back up on a schedule — a direction of travel the ME/CFS guidance warns against. What decides which you are in is not your diagnosis label but whether you get a delayed, disproportionate worsening after exertion. Ask your clinician that directly.
Where does the term come from, and who uses it clinically?
"Boom and bust" is not a diagnostic term and no guideline defines it formally. It entered health care through pain rehabilitation, where the model is older than the phrase: in operant approaches, activity is done to a quota — an amount, a time or a goal — rather than until symptoms say stop (12). You will meet the term in four places.
Pain rehabilitation and occupational therapy. Activity pacing is one of the most widely endorsed strategies among health professionals working in chronic pain (14), and the pacing questionnaire literature names its three targets as avoidance, overdoing, and overdoing-underdoing cycling (15).
Functional neurological disorder services. The 2015 consensus recommendations for physiotherapy in functional motor disorder, written by physiotherapists, neurologists and neuropsychiatrists, say a self-management plan should include "pacing, graded activity and exercise plans to prevent boom-bust activity cycles" (10). That is where the phrase appears in print with a clinical recommendation attached.
ME/CFS care, under a different name. The CDC's clinical guidance tells clinicians that "patients need to be advised about 'push and crash' cycles" (2). NICE uses neither phrase, but builds the same idea into its energy management recommendations, which say activity should be "never automatically increased but is maintained or adjusted (upwards after a period of stability or downwards when symptoms are worse)" (1).
Long COVID services. Structured pacing protocols for post-COVID syndrome are built around keeping people out of the cycle; one six-week protocol with weekly clinician calls cut post-exertional episodes from 3.4 a week to 1.1 (7).
What does the research actually show about breaking the cycle?
Mixed, and worth reading in full rather than in headline. Nobody has run a trial of "stopping boom and bust" as such; what exists is evidence on pacing, the main intervention aimed at it.
| Study | What it looked at | What it found | Keep in mind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews, Strong & Meredith, 2012 (11) | Meta-analysis, 41 studies, chronic pain | Avoidance was consistently associated with more pain, poorer psychological functioning and more disability. Enduring with activity went with better functioning — except where it reached severe pain aggravation. Pacing went with better psychological functioning but more pain and disability | Correlational; pacing measures may capture people already more disabled |
| Andrews et al., 2015 (13) | 68 adults, 5 days of actigraphy plus pain ratings 6× daily | High overactivity went with more variation in both pain and objective activity, and with repeated episodes of prolonged activity followed by significant pain increases | Small and preliminary; validates the pattern, not a treatment |
| Andrews et al., 2015 (14) | Two qualitative studies, interpretative phenomenological analysis | Overactivity was linked to pre-illness traits and was hard to change; most struggled to alter it after a pain programme, though some succeeded with professional support | Qualitative; about meaning, not frequency |
| Casson et al., 2023 (5) | Meta-analysis, 14 RCTs, chronic fatigue syndrome | Pacing reduced fatigue (Hedges' g −0.52, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.32) and psychological distress, and improved physical function (mean difference 7.18) versus no treatment or usual care | Improvement was larger where activity was gradually escalated — which NICE allows only after stability (1) |
| Sanal-Hayes et al., 2023 (4) | Scoping review, 17 studies, ME/CFS | 11 reported benefit, 4 reported no effect, 2 reported a worse outcome than the control group | The authors call the literature insufficient to set treatment practice for ME/CFS or Long COVID |
| Parker et al., 2023 (7) | 31 adults, post-COVID syndrome, 6 weeks | Post-exertional episodes fell from 3.4 to 1.1 per week; overall health scores rose from 51.4 to 60.6 | No control group, so time and natural recovery cannot be separated out |
| Antcliff et al., 2026 (12) | Systematic review, 9 studies, 873 participants, operant pacing in chronic pain | Direction of effect was towards improved function; findings for pain and fatigue were mixed. Common components: preplanning, activity-rest cycling, alternating activities and positions | Very low confidence by GRADE; synthesis limited to vote counting |
| Sanal-Hayes et al., 2026 (6) | RCT, 250 adults with Long COVID, 6 months | An app plus a wearable tracker sending energy-management messages at 50%, 75% and 100% of a daily activity allowance produced no difference in PEM scores versus an app alone (p = 0.614) | Broad inclusion and high natural recovery in Long COVID may have masked an effect |
Read together: the pattern is real and measurable, the intervention aimed at it has a moderate signal in chronic fatigue syndrome and a weak, mixed one in chronic pain, and the one large trial that added a device did not beat the process alone. The skill is the thing; tools support it.
How do you break the boom and bust cycle in practice?
Six moves, in the order they tend to work.
1. Find the baseline from your clean days, not your best day. Keep a one- to two-week record of what you did, how long it took, and what the following 24, 48 and 72 hours looked like. Mark the days that were not followed by a worsening. Those are your clean days, and what they have in common — how much upright time, how many cognitive blocks, how long the longest single stretch ran — is your current baseline. Your best day is an outlier, and usually the one that produced the bust. Our guide to the energy envelope sets out the diary method in detail.
2. Start below it. NICE's recommendation for people with ME/CFS taking up a physical activity programme is explicit: establish a baseline at a level that does not worsen symptoms, then initially reduce activity to be below that level, and maintain it successfully for a period of time before attempting any increase (1). The margin is not timidity. It is the room you need for the days when something unplanned happens, which is most days.
3. Plan rest before you need it. NICE's energy management advice includes planning periods of rest and activity, incorporating "the need for pre-emptive rest", alternating between different types of activity, and breaking activities into small chunks (1). Rest taken after you feel you need it is recovery; rest taken before is prevention, and it is the only kind that keeps the cycle from starting.
4. Use quotas by time, not by task completion. This is the operant principle, and the most useful import from pain rehabilitation: do the activity for a set amount or time, then stop, finished or not (12). "Fifteen minutes of kitchen, then sit down" survives a good day. "Until the kitchen is clean" does not, because a good day makes the kitchen look achievable. A timer helps, because the stop signal has to come from outside you.
5. Apply the good-day rule. On a day that feels better than usual, do what your baseline says, not what the morning says. Decide the night before what a good day is allowed to include, and keep the extra as margin. The CDC's warning is about exactly this moment (2). If the good day is the start of a real improvement, it will still be there next week — and then you can increase deliberately after a stable stretch, rather than opportunistically in the moment (1).
6. Treat an unavoidable big day as a multi-day budget. Some booms are not optional — a wedding, a flight, a funeral, a court date. Breaking the cycle does not mean never having one. It means planning the whole shape:
The week before: reduce below baseline deliberately and clear anything that can be moved. You are not resting because you are tired; you are resting because of what is coming.
The day itself: shorten it, sit or lie down wherever possible, and arrange somewhere you can withdraw to. Leaving early is part of the plan, not a failure of it.
The days after: block them in advance. How many comes from your own record of what similar events have cost, not from how you feel on the day.
Afterwards: write down what it actually cost. That is what makes the next big day plannable rather than a gamble.
Preplanning, activity-rest cycling, and alternating activities and positions were the components shared by nearly all the operant pacing interventions reviewed in 2026 (12).
Why does a written record beat memory for this?
Because the delay puts the cost on a day you have stopped connecting to the effort.
Memory does not store the two or three days before a bad day in the detail the pattern needs. It stores the bad day. Asked on Thursday what caused it, most people reach for Thursday — or for nothing, and conclude the illness is random. A record turns recall into arithmetic: what did Monday and Tuesday hold, how long was each block, how much of it was upright, and how many such days were there in a row.
NICE says so in as many words: make self-monitoring of activity as easy as possible, taking advantage of any tools the person already uses, such as an activity tracker, a phone heart-rate monitor or a diary (1). The emphasis on "easy" is deliberate — monitoring costs energy, and a system elaborate enough to become its own activity block has defeated itself.
What a record cannot do is tell you a bust is coming. We are not aware of any validated algorithm that predicts an individual crash or flare, and the largest trial so far points the same way (6). Looking backwards works; looking forwards, for now, does not. If you want to see exertion as it happens rather than after it, a heart-rate ceiling is the closest available tool — our heart-rate pacing guide covers what it can and cannot do.
None of this is obvious on your own, and most people work it out alone. Welltory runs a paid community, Energy Lab, where women living with energy-limiting conditions learn to read their own tracked data together — education and peer support, not medical care.
Living with boom and bust: the questions people ask next
How do I stop the boom and bust cycle at work?
Work is where the cycle is hardest to break, because the quota is usually set by someone else. The useful move is to count work as spending — cognitive, upright and emotional, not just physical — and to apply time quotas inside the day rather than task quotas: a set number of focused blocks with rest between them, finished or not. Two weeks of records showing what a heavy work day costs over the following 72 hours is the strongest material for a conversation about adjustments. NICE advises clinicians to discuss reasonable adjustments and to liaise with employers with the person's consent (1).
Should I exercise, or will that just start another boom and bust cycle?
It depends entirely on whether you get post-exertional malaise. If you do, NICE advises against any programme using fixed incremental increases in physical activity, including graded exercise therapy, and against generalised exercise programmes designed for healthy people or other illnesses (1); any increase waits for a stable stretch and is reversed if delayed worsening follows. If you do not — many people with fibromyalgia, for instance — exercise is evidence-based: EULAR's revised recommendations make it the only therapy-based "strong for" recommendation for fibromyalgia (16). Ask your clinician which group you are in first.
Why does a shower set off the boom and bust cycle?
A shower combines standing, heat, arm work and repeated changes of position, which makes it one of the more expensive activities of the day even though it looks like basic self-care. It also comes first thing, when a good morning makes everything feel possible — a common opening move in a boom. NICE recommends breaking activities into small chunks and building in pre-emptive rest (1), which here means sitting where possible, pausing with the water off, and drying and dressing seated or lying down.
How do I handle a wedding, a flight or a family visit without a crash afterwards?
Plan it as three phases rather than one day: reduce below baseline in the days before, keep the event short, seated and as quiet as you can arrange, and block out the days afterwards in advance. How many days to block comes from your own record of what similar events have cost, not from optimism. Breaking travel into stages and choosing the least upright option helps, as does knowing where you can lie down. A deliberate boom with a planned recovery is a different thing from an accidental one.
Does food or alcohol make the boom and bust cycle worse?
The evidence here is thinner than most people expect, and we are not aware of a dietary intervention shown to prevent post-exertional malaise or pain flares. What is reasonable to say is that an event involving alcohol usually also involves being upright, social and awake late, which are exertions in their own right. A practical approach is to log food and drink alongside activity for a couple of weeks and see whether anything tracks with your own worse days — and to ask your doctor before trying any elimination diet, which costs energy and rarely repays it.
I sleep badly after a big day. Is that part of the cycle?
For many people it is, and it works in both directions. In the 5-day observational study of chronic pain, higher daytime activity predicted longer periods of wakefulness at night (13). A short night then lowers what you can do the next day, which makes the following good day feel more urgent. If sleep is consistently wrecked after your heavier days, that is worth recording and raising with your clinician — NICE recommends personalised sleep advice as part of ME/CFS management (1).
How do I handle the guilt, and explain the boom and bust cycle to people who think I'm lazy?
The guilt does real work in the cycle: it is usually what powers the next boom. The research describes the opposite of laziness — in chronic pain, the people who cycle hardest tend to persist through symptoms, and commonly describe themselves as hard-working and perfectionistic before the illness (14). With family, start with the delay, because it is what makes you look inconsistent: "you looked fine on Saturday" is true and beside the point, since the cost of Saturday arrives on Monday. Showing your record beats arguing from memory, and an official source sometimes lands better — the CDC describes push and crash cycles as something patients need to be advised about, not blamed for (2).
Will I be stuck in this cycle forever?
Not necessarily, and breaking the cycle is not the same as accepting a smaller life permanently. NICE describes energy management as a long-term approach in which activity can be adjusted upwards after a period of stability, and says it can take weeks, months or sometimes years to reach stabilisation or increase tolerance (1). In chronic fatigue syndrome, pooled trial evidence shows pacing improving fatigue, distress and physical function (5). For many people the first sign of progress is not a busier week but a flatter one — fewer crashes, less payback, a baseline that stops sliding.
How to bring this up with your doctor
A record turns "I overdo it and then I'm wiped out" into something a clinician can act on.
Open with the shape, not the label. "When I have a better day I do more, and one to two days later I get much worse for several days. It keeps repeating." That describes the cycle and the delay without requiring anyone to have heard the term.
Bring one page, not the whole diary. Two weeks of activity blocks with durations, the days you went over, what the following 72 hours looked like, and your best estimate of a day you could repeat. Add any resting heart rate or morning readings you keep, labelled as personal trends.
Ask the question that decides everything: "Do I have post-exertional malaise, or is this a pain flare pattern?" The answer determines whether your plan should hold activity flat and increase only after stability, or flatten and then build. These are different plans, and both exist in the guidelines for different conditions.
Ask one question about any activity programme you are offered: "Is this fixed, or does it adjust if I get worse a day or two later?" A plan that advances on a calendar regardless of delayed symptoms is not designed for post-exertional malaise (1).
Ask about the right professional. NICE recommends referral to a physiotherapist or occupational therapist in an ME/CFS specialist team for energy management plans (1). In chronic pain and FND, those two professions are also the usual route to pacing support (10).
Be careful with exertion testing. Two-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing can document the day-two decrement objectively (8), but it can itself cause serious and sometimes lasting worsening — a decision for a specialist, not a routine check.
And do not put these down to the cycle: chest pain, fainting, breathlessness at rest, a new severe headache, or sudden weakness on one side need urgent care — call 911 in an emergency.
How Welltory helps — and what it cannot do
The limits first. Welltory is a general wellness product, not a medical device. It does not diagnose, predict, monitor, prevent, treat or mitigate ME/CFS, Long COVID, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, FND, post-exertional malaise or any other condition. It cannot tell you a bust is coming, and nothing we know of can. What it can do is keep a dated physiological record alongside your own notes, so the days before a bad day stop being a blank.
NICE suggests making self-monitoring as easy as possible using tools you already have (1). A routine that fits the boom and bust problem:
1. Log what happened, in the moment. If you wear an Apple Watch or Oura, the Today screen (iOS) flags stress stretches and asks "What happened?". Tap a suggested tag, type a few words, or just talk: "good day — did too much", "crash", "flare", "big event", "long drive", "shower", "short night", "deadline". You can also add a note any time with the plus icon ("Share your thoughts…"), which goes into your Journal. Tag the boom as well as the bust — the pairing is the point.
2. Take the morning reading the same way each day. A phone-camera (PPG) measurement uses a fingertip over the camera and flash for a short, still reading, and Heartbeat Report is built for taking it under the same conditions each morning. It is one snapshot, not continuous monitoring, and it does not replace an ECG — our article on how accurate HRV from a phone camera is covers the evidence. Welltory also reads measurements from a compatible chest strap, Apple Watch or Samsung Watch.
3. Look at the one to three days before, not the day itself. Put your morning HRV reading, resting heart rate, sleep analysis, stress minutes and Battery next to your own notes for the 72 hours before a bust (stress minutes and sleep analysis need a supported wearable; with the phone camera alone you have your spot readings). These are personal trends, not a verdict. If the numbers look fine and you feel terrible, believe your body.
4. Check My Patterns after two to three weeks of tagging. My Patterns collects the tags you add to stress and rest stretches on the Today screen, so it needs iOS with an Apple Watch or Oura. Patterns start to appear at around 7 tagged events, and insights typically need at least 7 occurrences of a tag in the current month plus some history from the month before. It shows which tagged situations come with stressful stretches, rarer tags your body reacts to strongly, day-of-week trends, heart rate during those episodes, and every occurrence of a tag.
5. Build a log for the appointment. The Journal shows HRV measurements, tags, mood and how you feel physically, notes, workouts and cycles synced from Apple Health, Samsung Health or Health Connect. For a longer record, export a CSV from the web app (Dashboard → choose a chart → Export) and bring it with your written diary. The free version keeps 30 days of data, so export what you want to keep.
Any patterns you find are associations to discuss with your doctor — not proof of a trigger, and not a warning system.
Where to learn this with other people. Welltory runs Energy Lab, a paid, moderated community for women aged 18 to 65 living with energy-limiting conditions — ME/CFS, Long COVID, fibromyalgia, POTS, MCAS and similar. It runs alongside the app: you keep collecting your own data, and the Lab is where members learn to read it together. Welltory's health educators and medical board answer questions from the group in plain language; there are no one-to-one consultations. It is education and peer support, not medical care, and it does not replace your own clinician.
How we made it
Made with AI tools, then edited and fact-checked by the Welltory team. See our Editorial & AI policy.
Data analysis by Jane Smorodnikova, co-founder of Welltory and the person who built the methodology behind how we read physiological data.
Written by Tatsiana Yashyna.


Discounts for blog readers: up to 36% off
See what affects your energy, stress, sleep, and daily state with Welltory
Educational content only, not medical advice, and not a diagnosis. Boom and bust is a behavioural pattern, not a condition, and the right response to it depends on your diagnosis: the activity guidance for ME/CFS and Long COVID with post-exertional malaise is the opposite of the graded-activity logic used in many chronic pain, fibromyalgia and functional neurological disorder programmes — decide which applies to you with your own clinician. No medication doses or supplement protocols are given here. Welltory is a general wellness product, not a medical device: it does not diagnose, predict, monitor, prevent, treat or mitigate any condition, and no validated method currently predicts an individual crash or flare in advance. New, changing or worsening symptoms need a clinician; chest pain, fainting, breathlessness at rest, a new severe headache or sudden one-sided weakness need urgent care. All sources retrieved on 6 October 2026.
Was this helpful?
Ask AI for a summary of page
Written by Jane Smorodnikova
The founder and CEO of Welltory. A recognized tech leader with two Master's degrees and experience at MIT, she has scaled Welltory to over 17 million users.
Written by Tatsiana Yashyna
References
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management (NG206). 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ME/CFS: treating the most disruptive symptoms first and preventing worsening of symptoms. Clinical care guidance for healthcare providers. https://www.cdc.gov/me-cfs/hcp/clinical-care/treating-the-most-disruptive-symptoms-first-and-preventing-worsening-of-symptoms.html
- Chu L, Valencia IJ, Garvert DW, Montoya JG. Deconstructing post-exertional malaise in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient-centered, cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0197811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197811
- Sanal-Hayes NEM, Mclaughlin M, Hayes LD, et al. A scoping review of 'Pacing' for management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): lessons learned for the long COVID pandemic. Journal of Translational Medicine 2023;21:720. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04587-5
- Casson S, Jones MD, Cassar J, Kwai N, Lloyd AR, Barry BK, Sandler CX. The effectiveness of activity pacing interventions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation 2023;45(23):3788–3802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2135776
- Sanal-Hayes NEM, Hayes LD, Mair JL, et al. A digital platform with activity tracking for energy management support in long COVID: a randomised controlled trial. Nature Communications 2026;17:945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64831-y
- Parker M, Sawant HB, Flannery T, et al. Effect of using a structured pacing protocol on post-exertional symptom exacerbation and health status in a longitudinal cohort with the post-COVID-19 syndrome. Journal of Medical Virology 2023;95(1):e28373. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28373
- Thomas C, Kudiersky N, Ansdell P, et al. Submaximal 2-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess exercise capacity and post-exertional symptom exacerbation in people with long COVID. Experimental Physiology 2025;111(2):435–448. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092576
- Gloeckl R, Zwick RH, Fürlinger U, et al. Practical recommendations for exercise training in patients with long COVID with or without post-exertional malaise: a best practice proposal. Sports Medicine – Open 2024;10:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00695-8
- Nielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, et al. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2015;86(10):1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309255
- Andrews NE, Strong J, Meredith PJ. Activity pacing, avoidance, endurance, and associations with patient functioning in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012;93(11):2109–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.029
- Antcliff D, Burns L, English E, et al. Operant approach activity pacing interventions for the management of chronic pain: a systematic review. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2026;42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001393
- Andrews NE, Strong J, Meredith PJ. Overactivity in chronic pain: is it a valid construct? Pain 2015;156(10):1991–2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000259
- Andrews NE, Strong J, Meredith PJ, Gordon K, Bagraith KS. "It's very hard to change yourself": an exploration of overactivity in people with chronic pain using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Pain 2015;156(7):1215–1231. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000161
- Antcliff D, McCray G, MacKenzie R, Marriott-Smith J, Cawley K, Holden MA. Testing the activity pacing questionnaire for validity, reliability and responsiveness: an outcome measure validation study. The Journal of Pain 2025;37:105568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105568
- Macfarlane GJ, Kronisch C, Dean LE, et al. EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2017;76(2):318–328. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209724










