Visceral fat vs subcutaneous fat: why weight moves to your middle after 35
Why fat moves to your middle after 35, why the deep kind matters most, how to check it with a tape measure, and what the research says shrinks it.

Short answer
Visceral fat vs subcutaneous fat comes down to location: subcutaneous fat lies under the skin, while visceral fat wraps around your liver and gut and is more strongly tied to diabetes and heart disease. After 35, muscle loss, less movement, poorer sleep, stress, and menopause push fat inward. A waist under half your height (ratio below 0.5) is reassuring.
If your jeans fit differently even though you eat the same way, you're not imagining it, and it's not a character flaw. Fat distribution really does change in midlife. The scale can stay almost flat while fat moves from your hips and thighs to your middle, and deeper inside your belly. That shift is driven by biology and by the slow way life changes after 35 — not by a sudden lack of willpower.
This article explains the difference between the two types of fat, why the visceral kind matters more for health, and why it builds up after 35 in both women and men. You'll learn how to check it at home with a tape measure, what the research says actually shrinks it (and what doesn't), and when a bigger waist is a reason to see a doctor.
What's the difference between visceral fat and subcutaneous fat?
Your body stores fat in several places, but two matter most for this question.
Subcutaneous fat sits just under your skin. It's the soft layer you can pinch on your belly, hips, thighs, and arms. Most of your body fat is this type.
Visceral fat sits deeper, inside your abdomen, behind the stomach muscles. It wraps around organs like the liver, intestines, and pancreas. You can't pinch it. A firm, rounder belly that pushes forward usually has more visceral fat behind it than a soft one you can grab.
The two types behave differently. Visceral fat is very active: it releases fatty acids and inflammatory signals, and much of what it releases goes straight to the liver through the portal vein, the blood vessel that carries blood from the gut to the liver. Researchers link this to liver insulin resistance, higher triglycerides (a type of blood fat), lower "good" HDL cholesterol, and low-grade inflammation. (doi.org)
Subcutaneous fat is not harmless in large amounts, but fat stored on the hips and thighs seems to behave in a more protective way. A review of population and lab studies found that more fat around the hips and thighs is linked to better blood sugar and cholesterol profiles. Lower-body fat tends to lock away extra fatty acids long term instead of releasing them into the blood. (doi.org)
That's why two people with the same weight can have very different health risks. Shape matters, not just size. If you're wondering about the dimpled skin on your thighs, that's a different story entirely — see why cellulite is anatomy rather than a metabolic failure.
Is visceral fat dangerous?
In large amounts, yes. Visceral fat is one of the clearest body-shape signals of heart and metabolic risk.
In the Framingham Heart Study, researchers scanned the abdomens of 3,001 adults (average age 50) with CT, a detailed X-ray scan. Both fat types were linked to blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol, but visceral fat was linked more strongly. In women, each step up in visceral fat went with 4.7 times higher odds of metabolic syndrome — a cluster of high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high triglycerides, low HDL, and a large waist — compared with 3.0 for subcutaneous fat. In men, the figures were 4.2 and 2.5. Visceral fat still mattered after accounting for BMI and waist size; subcutaneous fat didn't. (doi.org)
An international position statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society and a working group on visceral obesity concluded that visceral fat, measured accurately by CT or MRI, is an independent risk marker for heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and death. Fat that builds up in and around organs like the liver and heart may add to that risk. (doi.org) Excess visceral fat has also been linked to some cancers, including colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. (doi.org)
Waist size, the everyday stand-in for visceral fat, tells the same story. In the EPIC study of 359,387 adults in nine European countries, followed for almost 10 years, people with the largest waists had about twice the risk of death in men (2.05 times) and 1.78 times in women, compared with those with the smallest waists — even at the same BMI. (doi.org) Put another way, at any given BMI, each extra 5 cm (2 inches) of waist went with about a 17% higher risk of death in men and 13% in women. (doi.org)
These are observational links, not proof that fat alone causes every problem. But they're consistent, large, and the reason guidelines now ask doctors to measure waists, not just weigh people.
What causes visceral fat — and why does weight creep up after 35?
This is the "middle age spread" most people notice somewhere between their mid-30s and 50s. It rarely has one cause. Several slow changes pile on top of each other, and many of them push fat inward rather than just adding it.
Research on aging shows a shift toward more abdominal, especially visceral, fat and less lower-body subcutaneous fat. This can happen even when total weight, body fat, or waist size barely change — which is why a simple scale often misses it. (doi.org)
Is your metabolism really slowing down?
Less than most people think. A large study that measured daily energy use with doubly labeled water — a gold-standard method that tracks how many calories people burn in real life — found that, once body size and muscle are accounted for, energy expenditure stays stable from about age 20 to 60. It only starts to fall after 60. (doi.org)
So your "metabolism" isn't suddenly broken at 35. What changes is what your body is made of and how much you move.
Muscle quietly slips away
Muscle is your body's biggest calorie-burning tissue, and it also soaks up blood sugar after meals. In an MRI study of 468 adults aged 18 to 88, muscle as a share of body weight started to drop from early adulthood, while a noticeable fall in total muscle mass showed up around age 50, mostly in the legs. (doi.org) The medical word for age-related loss of muscle mass and strength is sarcopenia.
Losing muscle doesn't make you gain fat overnight. But over years, less muscle means a little less energy burned, a little worse blood sugar handling, and fewer places to store fuel outside your belly.
Life gets less active
Between desk jobs, commuting, kids, and caring for parents, daily movement tends to shrink in midlife — often without you noticing. That matters more for visceral fat than for weight. In the STRRIDE trial, 175 sedentary adults with overweight were randomly assigned to exercise or to stay inactive. Over just six months, the inactive group gained 8.6% more visceral fat. Walking or jogging the equivalent of about 11 miles (18 km) a week prevented that gain, and jogging about 20 miles a week shrank visceral fat by 6.9%. (doi.org)
We've written about how modern life quietly took movement out of the day in the convenience trap that removed movement from the day.
Sleep gets shorter and lighter
In a meta-analysis of 65 sleep-lab studies covering 3,577 people, adults' total sleep time, sleep efficiency (the share of time in bed you're actually asleep), and deep slow-wave sleep all declined with age, while time awake during the night went up. (doi.org) Add early meetings, late screens, night sweats, or a snoring partner, and many people in their 40s sleep noticeably less than they did at 25. We look at why short sleep matters so much in the next section.
Stress stays switched on
Chronic stress keeps the body's stress system active, and its main hormone, cortisol, can steer fat storage toward the belly. More on that below — briefly, because we cover it in depth elsewhere.
Hormones shift — in women and in men
For women, the menopause transition changes where fat is stored. For men, testosterone slowly falls. Both push fat toward the middle. We cover each in its own section.
None of this means the change is out of your hands. It means the cause is usually a combination of small, fixable things, not one mistake.
Does lack of sleep cause belly fat?
It can, and the best evidence here comes from a controlled experiment.
In a study at the Mayo Clinic, 12 healthy, non-obese adults aged 19 to 39 lived in a research unit for three weeks. In random order, they spent two weeks with either a 4-hour or a 9-hour sleep opportunity each night, with free access to food. When sleep was cut short, they ate about 308 more calories a day and burned no extra energy. They gained only about 0.5 kg (roughly a pound) more than during normal sleep, but CT scans showed total abdominal fat rose by 9% and visceral fat by about 11%. A standard body-fat scan (DEXA) did not pick up a difference in total fat — only the CT scan, which looks inside the belly, caught it. (doi.org)
The study was small and short, and 4 hours a night is extreme. But it suggests a mechanism: short sleep leads to eating more, and the extra fat collected in the abdomen, including visceral fat, even though total body fat barely changed.
Long-term data point the same way, with a twist. In the IRAS Family Study of 1,107 adults followed for five years, people under 40 who slept 5 hours or less gained more visceral fat (13 cm² more on CT) than those sleeping 6 to 7 hours. Sleeping 8 hours or more was also linked to some extra gain, and in people over 40 the researchers found no link at all. (doi.org) This was an observational study, so it can't prove cause — but it suggests that regular, adequate sleep is the goal, not simply more hours in bed.
The good news runs in the other direction too. In a randomized trial of 80 adults aged 21 to 40 with overweight who usually slept less than 6.5 hours, one personalized sleep-coaching session helped them sleep about 1.2 hours more per night in their real lives. Without any diet advice, they ate about 270 fewer calories a day than the control group and lost weight. (doi.org) The trial didn't measure visceral fat directly, but reducing calories without trying is exactly what tends to shrink it.
Sleep also shapes how your body handles sugar. We explain that link in insulin resistance, inactivity, and sleep: what's reversible.
Can stress cause belly fat?
Stress is part of the picture, though it's rarely the only cause.
Cortisol, the main stress hormone, helps release energy in a crisis. When it stays high for long stretches, reviews of clinical, cellular, and population studies suggest it favors fat storage in visceral fat — especially when it's combined with lower sex hormones and growth hormone. Long-term stress can also raise appetite and push people toward "stress eating." (doi.org)
In one lab study of 59 healthy premenopausal women, those who carried more fat around the middle released more cortisol in response to stressful tasks. Among the leaner women with belly fat, cortisol stayed high even when the same tasks were repeated on later days, instead of settling down. (doi.org) It's a small, cross-sectional study, so it shows a link, not cause.
The terms "cortisol belly" and "stress belly" get a lot of attention online. We cover what's real and what's hype in stress and weight gain and how cortisol affects your weight. The short version: calming a chronically overloaded stress system helps, but no supplement "lowers cortisol" enough to melt belly fat.
What causes menopause belly — and is "hormonal belly" real?
"Hormonal belly" isn't a medical diagnosis, but hormones really do change where fat goes. In midlife, the biggest hormonal driver for women is the menopause transition.
The best evidence comes from SWAN, the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, which followed 1,246 women with repeated body scans. Before the transition, women gained fat slowly, about 0.25 kg a year. When the menopause transition began, the rate of fat gain doubled to about 0.45 kg a year, and lean mass (mostly muscle) started to decline instead of rising. These changes continued until about two years after the final period, then leveled off. Over the transition, the share of body weight made of fat rose by about 3.6%. (doi.org)
Here's the part that explains a lot of frustration: in SWAN, weight itself did not speed up at the transition. Fat went up while muscle went down, so the scale kept climbing at the same slow pace while the body underneath changed. (doi.org)
Another study followed 156 women for four years with CT scans. All of them gained subcutaneous fat with age, but only those who went through menopause during the study had a significant increase in visceral fat. Their estrogen dropped, physical activity fell about two years before menopause, and fat burning fell by 32%. Energy burned during sleep also fell more in women who reached menopause than in those who didn't (7.9% versus 5.3%). (doi.org)
So "menopause belly" is real: falling estrogen, less muscle, and often less movement and worse sleep all push fat toward the middle at the same time. It usually starts in perimenopause, the years of changing cycles before periods stop. To understand that stage, see perimenopause explained and the full list of perimenopause symptoms. If you're unsure whether your broken sleep and tension are stress or hormones, stress or perimenopause: what HRV and sleep can show walks through the overlap. After the final period, menopause symptoms and what to eat in menopause cover the next steps.
Hormone therapy can help with menopause symptoms like hot flashes and night sweats, and some research suggests estrogen may favorably affect fat distribution. (doi.org) But it isn't prescribed as a weight-loss treatment, and it has its own risks and benefits to weigh with your doctor.
What about men? The male middle age spread
Men usually get the visceral pattern earlier. For the same amount of total body fat, men carry more visceral fat than premenopausal women, and as men gain fat, a bigger share of it goes to the visceral depot. Women tend to store more fat under the skin before reaching men's visceral levels — until menopause narrows the gap. (doi.org)
Testosterone slowly falls with age. In the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, which followed 1,156 men aged 40 to 70 for 7 to 10 years, total testosterone dropped about 1.6% a year within the same men, and the most usable form of testosterone dropped 2% to 3% a year. Men in better health had higher levels. (doi.org)
Low testosterone is linked to more central fat and less muscle, and the relationship runs both ways: belly fat can lower testosterone, and losing weight can raise it. (doi.org) That means a man's growing waistline and low energy can feed each other, but the loop can also run in reverse.
The other drivers — less movement, shorter sleep, more stress, gradual muscle loss — apply to men just as much as to women.
How do you measure visceral fat at home?
You can't measure visceral fat exactly without a scan. CT and MRI are the gold standard; they're used in research but rarely just to check body fat. (doi.org) Home "body fat" scales that estimate visceral fat use electrical signals and formulas, so treat their numbers as rough and watch the trend, not the single reading.
The most useful home tool is a simple tape measure.
How to measure your waist. Stand up, breathe out gently, and relax your stomach. Find the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your lowest rib, and wrap the tape around your middle halfway between them, keeping it level and snug but not tight. Health organizations use slightly different spots, such as at the top of the hip bone or at that midpoint; for tracking yourself, the key is to measure the same way each time. (doi.org) Measure at the same time of day, ideally in the morning before eating.
Classic waist cut-offs. For white adults, a waist above 102 cm (40 inches) in men and 88 cm (35 inches) in women has long been used to flag high risk. Experts note these single cut-offs are imperfect — they were designed to match a BMI of 30, and risk starts rising well before them, with lower thresholds used for some ethnic groups, such as Asian populations. (doi.org)
What is a healthy waist to height ratio?
The waist to height ratio fixes one of the biggest problems with waist cut-offs: a 90 cm waist means something different on someone 5 feet tall than on someone 6 feet tall.
How to calculate it. Divide your waist by your height, using the same units. For example, a waist of 80 cm and a height of 168 cm gives 80 ÷ 168 = 0.48.
The 0.5 rule. NICE, the UK's national health guidance body, added the waist to height ratio to its obesity guidance in 2022 and kept it in its current guideline. It classifies adults like this: 0.4 to 0.49 is healthy, 0.5 to 0.59 means increased health risk, and 0.6 or more means further increased risk. Its simple message: keep your waist to less than half your height. NICE recommends using the ratio for adults with a BMI under 35. (nice.org.uk)
The research backs this up. A meta-analysis of studies including more than 300,000 adults from several ethnic groups found that waist to height ratio was better than waist size alone, and better than BMI, at spotting people with high blood pressure, diabetes, and heart disease risk, in both men and women. (doi.org)
| Waist to height ratio | What it suggests (NICE) | Example for someone 168 cm (5'6") tall |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40–0.49 | Healthy central fat | Waist about 67–83 cm (26–33 in) |
| 0.50–0.59 | Increased health risk | Waist about 84–99 cm (33–39 in) |
| 0.60 or more | Further increased risk | Waist about 101 cm (40 in) or more |
A single number is only a starting point. What matters most is the direction your waist is moving over months.
What actually reduces visceral fat?
Here's the reassuring part: visceral fat is often the most responsive fat you have. Reviews of weight-loss studies show that lifestyle changes leading to weight loss tend to mobilize visceral fat preferentially. (doi.org) A systematic review of 61 studies found that modest weight loss produces a proportionally bigger drop in visceral fat than in subcutaneous fat. (doi.org)
Aerobic exercise is the core
Aerobic exercise means activity that gets you breathing harder for a sustained time, like brisk walking, cycling, jogging, or swimming. In a meta-analysis of 15 studies with 852 adults with overweight, aerobic exercise reduced visceral fat even without dieting, with moderate or high intensity working best. The authors estimated reductions of more than 30 cm² on CT in women and more than 40 cm² in men after as little as 12 weeks. (doi.org)
A second meta-analysis of 35 randomized trials also found aerobic exercise reduced visceral fat, and that even amounts below standard weight-loss recommendations could help. (doi.org)
Exercise shrinks visceral fat even when the scale doesn't move
A meta-analysis of 117 studies with 4,815 people compared exercise and diet. Diet caused more weight loss, but exercise tended to cut more visceral fat. Even without any weight loss, exercise was linked to a 6.1% drop in visceral fat, while diet without weight loss showed almost none (1.1%). The authors concluded that body weight is a poor marker of whether a lifestyle change is working. (doi.org) This is why a tape measure beats a scale after 35.
Strength training protects muscle — and helps too
Older reviews found resistance (strength) training alone didn't reliably cut visceral fat. (doi.org) A newer, larger meta-analysis of 58 randomized trials in healthy adults found it does: compared with no exercise, resistance training reduced body fat by about 1.46 percentage points, fat mass by about 0.55 kg, and visceral fat by a moderate amount. (doi.org)
Strength training also directly fights the muscle loss that drives midlife fat gain. The best plan after 35 combines both: regular aerobic activity for visceral fat and two or more strength sessions a week for muscle.
Protect your sleep
Given what short sleep does to appetite and belly fat, aiming for a regular 7 to 9 hours is one of the most practical steps. In the sleep-extension trial described above, simply sleeping about an hour longer led people to eat about 270 fewer calories a day without trying. (doi.org) Useful habits: a fixed wake-up time, a wind-down routine, a cool dark room, and fewer screens in bed.
Bring chronic stress down
Stress management won't replace movement and sleep, but it makes them easier and removes one push toward belly storage. Short daily breaks, walking outside, slow breathing, and protecting a few evenings a week all count.
Eat for a modest deficit, not a crash
You don't need an extreme diet. Since modest weight loss already favors visceral fat, sustainable changes — more protein and fiber, fewer ultra-processed snacks and sugary drinks, less alcohol, and not eating late into the night — are enough for most people.
How fast can you expect change?
In the exercise studies above, measurable visceral fat loss showed up within about 12 weeks. (doi.org) Many people notice their waist and energy improving before the scale moves much.
Why you can't spot-reduce belly fat
It's tempting to think that crunches burn belly fat. They don't. In a randomized trial, 24 sedentary adults did seven abdominal exercises five days a week for six weeks. Their abdominal muscle endurance improved, but there was no change in body weight, body fat, belly fat, waist size, or skinfold thickness. (doi.org)
Visceral fat responds to whole-body energy balance, overall movement, sleep, and hormones — not to exercising the muscles on top of it. Core work is still useful for posture and back health, just not for fat loss. The same goes for belly wraps, "fat-burning" creams, and "cortisol-lowering" supplements.
When should you see a doctor about belly fat?
A slowly growing waist is common, but it's still worth raising at your next checkup, especially if:
your waist to height ratio is 0.5 or higher, or your waist is above 102 cm (40 in) for men or 88 cm (35 in) for women;
you have a family history of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, or stroke;
you haven't had your blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol checked in the past few years;
you snore loudly, stop breathing during sleep, or wake unrefreshed — signs of sleep apnea, which is more common with a larger neck and waist;
your waist grew after starting a new medication, such as steroids or some mood-stabilizing or antipsychotic medicines (don't stop them on your own).
See a doctor sooner if:
weight settles in your belly and face quickly, with purple stretch marks, easy bruising, muscle weakness, or new high blood pressure — these can be signs of excess cortisol from a medical condition, which is rare but needs testing;
you're a woman with irregular periods, extra facial or body hair, or acne alongside belly weight gain;
you're a man with low sex drive, erection problems, or loss of body hair along with a growing waist;
you feel constantly cold and tired with weight gain, or have very heavy or missed periods;
your belly swells fast, feels hard or painful, or comes with bloating that doesn't go away, changes in bowel habits, or unexplained weight loss elsewhere. Seek same-day care for severe pain, fever, vomiting, or yellowing of the skin or eyes.
How to bring this up with your doctor — and what to ask for
Say it plainly. "My waist has grown about 8 cm in two years even though my weight has barely changed, and I'd like to understand my risk." Specific, measured changes get more attention than "I've put on some weight."
Bring context. Your waist and height measurements over time, your waist to height ratio, how much you sleep, how active you are, any big stress changes, your family history, and, for women, where you are in your cycle or menopause. A few weeks of sleep and activity data from your phone or wearable can make the picture clearer.
Ask these specifically. Can we check my blood pressure, fasting glucose or HbA1c (a three-month average of blood sugar), and cholesterol and triglycerides? Should we look at my liver enzymes, given the link between belly fat and fatty liver? Could my thyroid, perimenopause, testosterone, or a medication be playing a role? Is my snoring worth a sleep apnea test? Would a referral to a dietitian, physiotherapist, or obesity specialist help?
If you are dismissed. "I understand this is common, but my waist to height ratio is above 0.5, and guidelines say that's linked to higher risk. Can we note it in my record and check my blood sugar and cholesterol?" A documented concern is much more likely to be followed up.
How Welltory helps
Welltory can't see your visceral fat, and no wearable can. What it can do is make the drivers of visceral fat visible — the everyday signals that decide which way your waistline goes.
Sleep. Welltory tracks how long and how regularly you sleep. Given what two weeks of short nights did to belly fat in the Mayo Clinic study, seeing a pattern of 5.5-hour weeknights is often the first useful insight.
Activity. Steps and active minutes show whether you're anywhere near the movement that protected against visceral fat gain in the research, or whether a busy season has quietly made you sedentary.
Stress load, HRV, and resting heart rate. HRV (heart rate variability, the small variations between heartbeats) and resting heart rate reflect how well your body is recovering. Welltory compares them with your own baseline, so you can see when stress has been building for weeks instead of just feeling "tired." As you add regular aerobic exercise and sleep better, these signals may improve alongside your waist.
Morning energy. Your morning body battery shows how much you have in the tank each day, which helps you plan hard workouts on recovered days and gentler ones when you're depleted.
My Patterns. With My Patterns, you can add notes and tags like "strength training," "late dinner," "alcohol," or "waist 86 cm," and over a few weeks see what tends to come before better sleep and lower stress. That turns vague advice into your own experiment.
What Welltory can't do: it doesn't measure body fat or waist size, and it can't diagnose insulin resistance, hormone problems, or heart disease. Keep a tape measure for your waist and see your doctor for blood tests. Use Welltory to stay on top of the habits that move the needle — and to see progress in something other than the bathroom scale.
How we made it
This article rests on peer-reviewed research and official guidance: visceral and subcutaneous fat and cardiometabolic risk (Fox et al. 2007; Neeland et al. 2019; Tchernof & Després 2013; Manolopoulos et al. 2010; Shuster et al. 2012), waist size and mortality (Pischon et al. 2008; Ross et al. 2020), aging and body composition (Kuk et al. 2009; Janssen et al. 2000; Pontzer et al. 2021), inactivity and visceral fat (Slentz et al. 2005), sleep across the lifespan and sleep's effect on abdominal fat and energy intake (Ohayon et al. 2004; Covassin et al. 2022; Hairston et al. 2010; Tasali et al. 2022), stress and cortisol (Björntorp 2001; Epel et al. 2000), the menopause transition (Greendale et al. 2019; Lovejoy et al. 2008), sex differences and testosterone in men (Lemieux et al. 1993; Feldman et al. 2002; Kelly & Jones 2015), waist to height ratio (Ashwell et al. 2012; NICE NG246), and interventions for visceral fat (Vissers et al. 2013; Ismail et al. 2012; Verheggen et al. 2016; Wewege et al. 2022; Chaston & Dixon 2008; Vispute et al. 2011).
No Welltory user data is used in this article. Welltory does not collect body fat, weight, or waist measurements; the Welltory metrics described are there to help readers track sleep, activity, stress, and recovery alongside the habits discussed.


Discounts for blog readers: up to 36% off
See what affects your energy, stress, sleep, and daily state with Welltory
This article is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. For concerns about weight, body composition, or metabolic health, talk to a doctor. Welltory measures physiological signals like heart rate, HRV, sleep, activity, and stress; it does not measure body fat or diagnose anything.
Was this helpful?
Ask AI for a summary of page
Written by Jane Smorodnikova
The founder and CEO of Welltory. A recognized tech leader with two Master's degrees and experience at MIT, she has scaled Welltory to over 17 million users.
Written by Tatsiana Yashyna
Reviewed by Anna Elitzur
With her medical degree, Anna reviews Welltory's health content for medical accuracy and alignment with current clinical guidelines and research.
References
- Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007;116(1):39-48. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675355
- Neeland IJ, Ross R, Després JP, et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2019;7(9):715-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587%2819%2930084-1
- Tchernof A, Després JP. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update. Physiological Reviews 2013;93(1):359-404. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00033.2011
- Manolopoulos KN, Karpe F, Frayn KN. Gluteofemoral body fat as a determinant of metabolic health. International Journal of Obesity 2010;34(6):949-959. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.286
- Shuster A, Patlas M, Pinthus JH, Mourtzakis M. The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis. British Journal of Radiology 2012;85(1009):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/38447238
- Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, et al. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359(20):2105-2120. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0801891
- Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, et al. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 2020;16(3):177-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7
- Kuk JL, Saunders TJ, Davidson LE, Ross R. Age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution. Ageing Research Reviews 2009;8(4):339-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2009.06.001
- Pontzer H, Yamada Y, Sagayama H, et al. Daily energy expenditure through the human life course. Science 2021;373(6556):808-812. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe5017
- Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. Journal of Applied Physiology 2000;89(1):81-88. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81
- Slentz CA, Aiken LB, Houmard JA, et al. Inactivity, exercise, and visceral fat. STRRIDE: a randomized, controlled study of exercise intensity and amount. Journal of Applied Physiology 2005;99(4):1613-1618. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00124.2005
- Ohayon MM, Carskadon MA, Guilleminault C, Vitiello MV. Meta-analysis of quantitative sleep parameters from childhood to old age in healthy individuals: developing normative sleep values across the human lifespan. Sleep 2004;27(7):1255-1273. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/27.7.1255
- Covassin N, Singh P, McCrady-Spitzer SK, et al. Effects of experimental sleep restriction on energy intake, energy expenditure, and visceral obesity. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2022;79(13):1254-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.038
- Hairston KG, Bryer-Ash M, Norris JM, et al. Sleep duration and five-year abdominal fat accumulation in a minority cohort: the IRAS family study. Sleep 2010;33(3):289-295. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/33.3.289
- Tasali E, Wroblewski K, Kahn E, Kilkus J, Schoeller DA. Effect of sleep extension on objectively assessed energy intake among adults with overweight in real-life settings: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2022;182(4):365-374. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8098
- Björntorp P. Do stress reactions cause abdominal obesity and comorbidities? Obesity Reviews 2001;2(2):73-86. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00027.x
- Epel ES, McEwen B, Seeman T, et al. Stress and body shape: stress-induced cortisol secretion is consistently greater among women with central fat. Psychosomatic Medicine 2000;62(5):623-632. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200009000-00005
- Greendale GA, Sternfeld B, Huang M, et al. Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transition. JCI Insight 2019;4(5):e124865. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.124865
- Lovejoy JC, Champagne CM, de Jonge L, Xie H, Smith SR. Increased visceral fat and decreased energy expenditure during the menopausal transition. International Journal of Obesity 2008;32(6):949-958. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.25
- Lemieux S, Prud'homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Després JP. Sex differences in the relation of visceral adipose tissue accumulation to total body fatness. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1993;58(4):463-467. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/58.4.463
- Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, et al. Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2002;87(2):589-598. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.2.8201
- Kelly DM, Jones TH. Testosterone and obesity. Obesity Reviews 2015;16(7):581-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12282
- Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews 2012;13(3):275-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00952.x
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Overweight and obesity management (NG246). Waist-to-height ratio recommendations first added to guideline CG189 in 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng246
- Vissers D, Hens W, Taeymans J, et al. The effect of exercise on visceral adipose tissue in overweight adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013;8(2):e56415. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056415
- Ismail I, Keating SE, Baker MK, Johnson NA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of aerobic vs. resistance exercise training on visceral fat. Obesity Reviews 2012;13(1):68-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00931.x
- Verheggen RJ, Maessen MF, Green DJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of exercise training versus hypocaloric diet: distinct effects on body weight and visceral adipose tissue. Obesity Reviews 2016;17(8):664-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12406
- Wewege MA, Desai I, Honey C, et al. The effect of resistance training in healthy adults on body fat percentage, fat mass and visceral fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine 2022;52(2):287-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01562-2
- Chaston TB, Dixon JB. Factors associated with percent change in visceral versus subcutaneous abdominal fat during weight loss: findings from a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity 2008;32(4):619-628. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803761
- Vispute SS, Smith JD, LeCheminant JD, Hurley KS. The effect of abdominal exercise on abdominal fat. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2011;25(9):2559-2564. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fb4a46


-2.jpg)